hiyam̐ nirguna nayananhi saguna rasanā rāma sunāma | manahum̐ puraṭa saṃpuṭa lasata tulasī lalita lalāma || The foremost religious practice, formal or otherwise, local or foreign, is that which brings about the highest transcendental taste, or rasa. In every area of activity there is sought after a taste, some direct interaction that brings pleasure. How then can spiritual life, deemed the eternal engagement, one that transcends the bounds of time and space, be lacking in transcendental pleasure resulting from the highest taste? Tulsidas herein says that the most auspicious name, orsunama, of Lord Rama, the Personality of Godhead, is the true gem in life, and it is safely guarded by two of the most popular and often misunderstood instruments for spiritual awakening found in the Vedic teachings, nirguna and saguna worship. One who is fortunate enough to taste the sweet and transcendental name of the Lord, which is non-different from His personal self, on their tongue will be most benefitted, as all of their spiritual practices from the current and previous lives will finally fructify into full blown bhava, or a return to the original nature of pure love and devotion to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In the ignorant state, where the human being only sees God as being all-punishing death lurking around the corner, just waiting to come and take everything away, the activities taken up bring flickering happiness and no advancement in consciousness. The key distinction between a mature human being and an immature one is the level of knowledge possessed, which is acquired through both experience and the free passage of information from authority figures. When in the mature state, if consciousness remains wholly fixed upon objects of the phenomenal world, with no detachment, intelligence or information of the eternality of the soul present, the activities adopted won’t be any different from those of an animal, i.e. the behavior of the “knowledgeable” will mimic that of the ignorant. If both a human being and an animal have the same priority system for action, how are the two species any different? If God is really just nature consisting of innumerable movements of wind, elements and the sun, what is the use of becoming a human being? An animal lives the life of sense gratification with minimal impediment, and their fears are greatly mitigated as well. The dog doesn’t worry about a mortgage payment, divorce, or impending death. It simply does whatever it wants, whenever it wants. Only in the human species is there a chance to understand God, or a higher spiritual being to whom we are related. When the Supreme Being is not properly identified but at least somewhat acknowledged, there are different classes of religious activities taken to. The majority of the religiously inclined population of the world presently follows a system of worship that can be likened to what the Vedas refer to as devotion to the nirguna form. The Vedas describe the Absolute Truth, the one entity that is beyond the duality, illusion and limitation that is concomitant with a material existence, as both nirguna and saguna. Gunas are material qualities, or those elements which bind one to the cycle of birth and death. These descriptions of the Absolute Truth provided by the Vedas are not faulty in any way, but they are meant to be understood from the perspective of the conditioned eye. The Absolute Truth is always free of gunas, but in the conditioned state, we can view Him as having attributes – where He has a face, hands, legs, etc. - or we can see Him as being formless and all-pervading, a powerful beam of spiritual energy known as Brahman. Regardless of how one views Him, the Lord’s original position as Bhagavan, He who is infused with spiritual attributes, remains unchanged. The nirguna and saguna viewpoints are similar to how we say that the sun has risen or that the sun is not out today, but in fact the sun’s fiery properties and position have not changed at all, only the clarity of our vision has.
When the authorized deity form of the Personality of Godhead residing within the temple or the home is regularly offered obeisances, the practice is labeled as saguna worship, and it is considered more advanced because at least the nature of the Lord is better understood. The impersonalists, who take their mistaken conception of nirguna to be the ultimate feature of the Truth, view the devotees who follow saguna worship as less intelligent. “Maya is false and the cause of bondage. Since they are not intelligent enough to understand Vedanta philosophy, they are pretending to worship some form concocted out of resin or stone. Once they advance past this stage, once they gain detachment from material life, they can understand the all-pervading nature of the Absolute Truth and give up their saguna worship.” Indeed, when impersonalists encounter students who aren’t attracted to or can’t understand Vedanta, they recommend worship of any saguna form, irrespective of the authority of tradition or benefit of worship. “Just pick any form you like and worship it, for meditation, austerity and knowledge are the ultimate aims.” The main limitation with saguna worship materializes when the devotee is away from the temple or not in front of the original Lord, His deity, personal incarnation or picture representation. When we’re not in the temple, does it mean that God is not with us? The nirguna worshipers in this respect have a leg up, as they understand that Brahman is all-pervading. The saguna worshipers, through steady practice and devotion, may eventually come to this same realization, but it is very difficult if all one does is stare at a deity. When the deity is not present before the eyes, the worshiper again becomes prone to the effects of maya and her temptations. Maya, as the faithful servant of Bhagavan, lures the living entity infused with material desires into worshiping so many other things except God. Certainly God is everything, but His personal presence is not reflected in matter, at least not when the material elements are used for personal satisfaction. The deity, though composed of material elements, is considered spiritual because of how it is viewed and worshiped. God created the elements of nature after all, so if they are used for expanding knowledge of His divine grace, they cannot be considered illusory or harmful. Tulsidas here asks the impersonalists to keep their precious nirguna form safely tucked away in the heart and the saguna worshipers to keep the deity form straight in front of their eyes. But to tie both pieces together, to really understand who the object of worship is, one must taste the name of the Lord on the tongue. Chanting Rama’s name is likened to the jewel in the golden box made up of nirguna and saguna worship, with the two styles of worship acting as the top and bottom covers. Indeed, this is an entirely valid comparison, as religious practices that are below bhakti, or devotional service, are ideally meant to lead up to the final stage of transcendental love, which is best exhibited through the chanting process. One who is expert in chanting surpasses the limitations of strict nirguna and saguna worship. Prahlada Maharaja, the five-year old son of the demon king Hiranyakashipu, chanted Lord Vishnu’s names and thought of Him all the time without ever having met Him. When thrown into a pit of fire and tossed off the side of a cliff, Prahlada simply meditated on Vishnu and His name and was thus saved. The impersonalists will say that he was focusing on the nirguna aspect, but since Prahlada understood who Bhagavan was after hearing from Narada Muni, even his apparent nirguna worship was perfect. Through chanting the Lord’s name, consciousness becomes purified, and from this the mind becomes the greatest friend, an agent for real change. |
Search This Blog
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
The Gem in the Box
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment