Cecile G. Tamura
Stephen Hawking had a vision that the universe expanded out of a
dimensionless point, rather like a shuttlecock. Recently, his stunning
proposal has come under attack, but a vigorous defense has been mounted.
“If you know the wave function of the universe, why aren’t you rich?” — Murray Gell-Mann
" The “no-boundary proposal,” which Hawking and his frequent collaborator, James Hartle, fully formulated in a 1983 paper, envisions the cosmos having the shape of a shuttlecock. Just as a shuttlecock has a diameter of zero at its bottommost point and gradually widens on the way up, the universe, according to the no-boundary proposal, smoothly expanded from a point of zero size. Hartle and Hawking derived a formula describing the whole shuttlecock — the so-called “wave function of the universe” that encompasses the entire past, present and future at once — making moot all contemplation of seeds of creation, a creator, or any transition from a time before.
Hartle and Hawking’s proposal radically reconceptualized time. Each
moment in the universe becomes a cross-section of the shuttlecock; while
we perceive the universe as expanding and evolving from one moment to
the next, time really consists of correlations between the universe’s
size in each cross-section and other properties — particularly its
entropy, or disorder. Entropy increases from the cork to the feathers,
aiming an emergent arrow of time. Near the shuttlecock’s rounded-off
bottom, though, the correlations are less reliable; time ceases to exist
and is replaced by pure space. As Hartle, now 79 and a professor at the
University of California, Santa Barbara, explained it by phone
recently, “We didn’t have birds in the very early universe; we have
birds later on. … We didn’t have time in the early universe, but we have
time later on.”
No comments:
Post a Comment