Search This Blog
Wednesday, June 15, 2016
காந்தஹார்- Kandahar Film (ஈரானிய திரைப்படம்) by Iranian director, Mohsen Makhmalbaf
2001ஆம் ஆண்டில் திரைக்கு வந்த படம். பல மிகச் சிறந்த திரைப்படங்களை இயக்கி, உலக அளவில் புகழ் பெற்ற இயக்குனராக ஒளி வீசிக் கொண்டிருக்கும் ஈரானிய திரைப்பட இயக்குனர் Mohsen Makhmalmaf இயக்கிய ஒரு மாறுபட்ட கதைக் கருவைக் கொண்ட இப்படம், வித்தியாசமான படங்களைப் பார்ப்போர்கள் மத்தியில் பெரிய அளவில் கொண்டாடப்பட்டுக் கொண்டிருக்கிறது.
பொழுது போக்கு அம்சங்களைக் கொண்ட படங்களை உருவாக்கி விட்டு, ஏதோ பெரிதாக சாதித்து விட்டோம் என்று மார்பைத் தட்டிக் கொண்டு ஆர்ப்பரிப்போருக்கு மத்தியில், யாரும் எடுப்பதற்காக அஞ்சக் கூடிய ஒரு பேசப்படும் கதைக் கருவைக் கையாண்டு, அதை ஒரு நேர்த்தியான திரைப்படமாக எடுத்திருக்கும் Mohsen Makhmalmafன் அசாத்திய துணிச்சலை நாம் பாராட்டியே ஆக வேண்டும்.
''Kandahar''
is bound to attract potential audiences, if only because it may be the
only film whose name gets more mentions than Harry Potter on CNN. Though
the Iranian director Mohsen Makhmalbaf's picture was filmed long before
today's breaking news from Afghanistan, it is worthy of some attention
because it happens to portray the culture -- specifically the treatment
of women in that Taliban stronghold -- in forceful and dramatic terms.
An Afghan journalist, Nafas (Nelofer Pazira), who left Afghanistan and
is now based in Canada, goes back home to find her troubled sister. Mr.
Makhmalbaf isn't much of a storyteller, and Ms. Pazira is more than his
equal in her lack of acting ability. She looks slightly distracted when
staring into the camera; she seems to be waiting for instructions to
change expression to come over an ear piece, and the instructions never
quite get there. Yet she has the command of someone who is accustomed to
sitting before the camera and holds positions as if she were born to be
there, which makes her the film's star by sheer power of concentration.
(In real life Ms. Pazira, who grew up in Kabul, is a Canadian
television journalist.) To say that she doesn't lend a great deal of
emotional credibility to ''Kandahar,'' which opens today at the Lincoln
Plaza, is an understatement.
As Nafas slips into Afghanistan to begin her search, she runs into a
number of situations that almost make the movie seem to be taking place
on a back lot, a dreamy Never-was Land where each scene is a setup for
another surprise. (The movie was filmed in Iran.) But the bleached,
sun-beaten landscapes are undeniably real, as are the hardships that the
women suffer as they battle to survive the inhospitable land and the
rigidity of the Taliban. Children play and pray while machine guns, worn
and obviously used, sit near their feet. Desperation has a ghostly
presence here: it's never spoken, but we can feel it nonetheless, and
it's a part of the everyday life in the encampments where these women
live.
Nafas meets a doctor who treats women in a most unusual fashion, at
least to Westerners, and who isn't what he seems. He talks to his female
patients while they're under a sheet -- he views them through a hole --
and the low-key assurance in his voice is a marvelous contradiction to
the strangeness of the situation. By this point Ms. Pazira's vacant
stare has become a part of the texture of ''Kandahar'': you almost can't
imagine anybody else -- certainly not someone who might actually react
to these unusual proceedings -- as the lead.
On this level the director displays talent by providing notes of
absurdity and unforgettable visuals. Somehow it's as if he is cognizant
that his star, and most of the rest of the cast, for that matter, simply
can't carry a scene. His compensatory touches have a jaw-dropping
power: for example a shot of prosthetic limbs parachuting onto the bleak
desert landscape as scores of handicapped men on crutches await the
legs as they fall from the sky. When he pulls off things like this,
''Kandahar'' feels like a Magritte painting rendered in sand tones, and
your eyes are drawn to the screen.
There aren't enough of these moments, though, and Mr. Makhmalbaf
lessens their power by repeating them. He knows he is dealing with a
hot, potent subject, and he has an eye for astonishing imagery, which he
integrates into ''Kandahar'' in such a way that the film occasionally
succeeds on its own made-under-a-full-moon terms: it's a wide-screen
daydream. But the way the film works defeats any melodramatic urgency in
this tale of enduring punishment. The awful moments he creates have the
time-delay impact of a nightmare: the potency of the horrors hit and
linger after the freakishness of an image or a moment fades away and the
creeping realization of exactly what you've just witnessed finally hits
you. Sometimes that impact comes like a blow to the back of the head.
KANDAHAR
Written, edited and directed by Mohsen Makhmalbaf; in Farsi and English, with English subtitles; director of photography, Ebraham Ghafouri; music by Mohamad Reza Darvishi; produced by Makhmalbaf Film House and Bac Films; released by Avatar Films. At the Lincoln Plaza, Broadway at 62nd Street. Running time: 85 minutes. This film is not rated.
WITH: Nelofer Pazira (Nafas), Hassan Tantai (Tabib Sahid) and Sadou Teymouri (Khak).
KANDAHAR
Written, edited and directed by Mohsen Makhmalbaf; in Farsi and English, with English subtitles; director of photography, Ebraham Ghafouri; music by Mohamad Reza Darvishi; produced by Makhmalbaf Film House and Bac Films; released by Avatar Films. At the Lincoln Plaza, Broadway at 62nd Street. Running time: 85 minutes. This film is not rated.
WITH: Nelofer Pazira (Nafas), Hassan Tantai (Tabib Sahid) and Sadou Teymouri (Khak).
The film Kandahar serves as a timely memorial to the brutality of the Taleban regime, and its release comes as the world's attention is focused on the town after which it is named.
One day the world will see your problems and come to your aid
|
|
But it is given added edge by the knowledge that the Taleban regime is collapsing in real life as the movie unfolds.
At the beginning of the film one of the characters tells a crowd of Afghan refugees that "one day the world will see your problems and come to your aid".
But when the film was made, few people would have been able to find Kandahar on a map. The world had turned its back on Afghanistan.
Beneath the veil
The film tells the story of an Afghan-Canadian journalist, Nafas, who returns to Kandahar to rescue her sister who is so depressed that she has threatened to kill herself before the last solar eclipse of the 20th century.
As she enters Afghanistan, Nafas is told she must wear a burqa - the all-encompassing veil - to protect the honour of her male escort.
|
Her veil is not one of the now familiar blue nylon burqas, but a woven muted green and pink veil. In one scene she joins a large group of women going to a wedding party, all wearing brightly-coloured burqas.
The women may be faceless, but the veils themselves are strangely beautiful.
By ordering women to be fully covered, the religious militia also never quite know what is underneath the veil.
But the audience is permitted to look inside: girls secretly apply lipstick and paint their nails; Nafas carries a tape-recorder; and a man uses the subterfuge to escape arrest.
Surreal
The journey to Kandahar must be completed within three days if Nafas is to rescue her sister, which gives the film an urgency that highlights the unbearable timelessness of Afghanistan - a country where time seems to have stopped.
This surrealism is not an aesthetic device, but a straight portrayal of a people pushed to the limits of survival.
|
The laboured repetition dramatises the absurdity of daily life in Afghanistan in a way in which straight reporting can rarely do.
As the journey continues we are taken on a tour of the surreal land which decades of war and the Taleban regime have wrought out of Afghanistan.
This surrealism is not an aesthetic device, but a straight portrayal of a people pushed to the limits of survival.
In one of the most memorable scenes, a group of one-legged landmine victims race on crutches to claim pairs of false legs that Red Cross helicopters have dropped from the sky. It could be from a Fellini film, yet it is quite likely to be real.
Although a feature film, Kandahar is half documentary, and many of the characters are not actors but refugees that the crew met along the way.
The latest weapon against climate change? Turning carbon dioxide into stone better than basalt.
Carbon dioxide has been pumped underground and turned rapidly into stone, demonstrating a radical new way to tackle climate change.
The unique project promises a cheaper and more secure way of burying
CO2 from fossil fuel burning underground, where it cannot warm the
planet. Such carbon capture and storage
(CCS) is thought to be essential to halting global warming, but
existing projects store the CO2 as a gas and concerns about costs and
potential leakage have halted some plans.
The new research pumped CO2 into the volcanic rock under Iceland
and sped up a natural process where the basalts react with the gas to
form carbonate minerals, which make up limestone. The researchers were
amazed by how fast all the gas turned into a solid – just two years,
compared to the hundreds or thousands of years that had been predicted.
The Iceland project has already been increased in scale to bury
10,000 tonnes of CO2 a year and the basalt rocks used are common around
the world, forming the floor of all the oceans and parts of the land
too. “In the future, we could think of using this for power plants in
places where there’s a lot of basalt and there are many such places,”
said Martin Stute, at Columbia University in the US and part of the
research team.
Testing has taken place in the Columbia River Basalts,
extensive deposits in Washington and Oregon in the US. India, which has
many polluting coal power plants, has huge basalt deposits in the Deccan Traps.
One potential challenge for the new technique is that it requires
large amounts of water: 25 tonnes for each tonne of CO2 buried. But
Matter said seawater could be used, which would be in plentiful supply
at coastal sites. Another is that subterranean microbes might break down
carbonate to methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, but this was not seen
in the Iceland research.
The research, called the Carbfix project,
took place at Iceland’s Hellisheidi power plant, the world’s largest
geothermal facility. The plant pumps up volcanically heated water to run
electricity-generating turbines but this also brings up volcanic gases,
including carbon dioxide and nasty-smelling hydrogen sulphide.
The researchers re-injected 230 tonnes of the gas, which was
dissolved in water to prevent it escaping, down into the basalt to a
depth of 400-500m. They used tracer chemicals to show that over 95% of
CO2 was turned into stone within two years, “amazingly fast” according
to Matter. Edda Aradottir, who heads the project for Reykjavik Energy, said: “It was a very welcome surprise.”
The Iceland project has now begun scaling up to bury 10,000 tonnes of
CO2 a year, plus the hydrogen sulphide which also turns into minerals.
The Columbia University group are also investigating another rock type, found in Oman, which may be able to turn CO2 into rock even better than basalt.
In conventional CCS, the CO2 is stored as a gas in sedimentary rocks
such as exhausted oil fields under the North Sea. Unlike basalt, these
rocks lack the minerals needed to convert CO2 into stone. Such
sedimentary reservoirs could potentially leak and therefore have to be
monitored, which adds to costs.
They have also raised concerns from the public and projects on land in the Netherlands and Germany have been halted as a result. “In Europe you can forget about onshore CCS,” said Matter.
Conventional CCS also requires the CO2 to be separated from the mix
of gases emitted by power stations and industrial plants, which is
expensive. But the basalt-based CCS does not require this. However,
Matter said there would still be a role for conventional CCS in places
where power plants are close to good reservoirs.
thanks https://www.theguardian.com
570Tuesday, June 14, 2016
The dark side of the universe – a primer
With dark matter,
dark energy, phantom matter and even a dark force, physics news can
sometimes sound like the voiceover for a superhero movie. So what’s
behind all the ominous-sounding jargon?
Over the past 40 years
astronomers have realised that everything we can see – all the stars,
planets and galaxies – make up less than 5% of the entire universe. What
is the rest? The short answer is, we have no idea.
What we do
know is there are two gaping holes in our understanding of our universe.
As a placeholder, physicists call them dark matter and dark energy.
In a nutshell, dark matter is the invisible stuff which we can only
detect from the way its immense gravity moves stars and galaxies.
Dark energy, on the other hand, is the mysterious something causing the universe to expand with ever increasing speed.
We don’t know if dark matter and dark energy are related – in fact they’re probably two completely different phenomena, both called “dark” just because we can’t see them.
Dark energy, on the other hand, is the mysterious something causing the universe to expand with ever increasing speed.
We don’t know if dark matter and dark energy are related – in fact they’re probably two completely different phenomena, both called “dark” just because we can’t see them.
Dark matter
How was it discovered?
Since the 1930s astronomers knew that the way galaxies spin did not
make sense. The stars at the edges of galaxies were moving much faster
than expected – so fast they should have been flung off the cosmic
merry-go-round and out into deep space.
But these strange motions
could be explained if there was a bunch of extra matter in and around
the galaxies – matter that we can’t see. It’s this “dark matter” that
holds galaxies together.
Since then, many other observations
beyond the scale of whirling galaxies, from the choreography of galaxy
clusters, to the collision of nebulae, all suggested the same thing.
Although some physicists have entertained other theories, such as
modifications to gravity, by now most are pretty sure dark matter
exists. It’s the only explanation that suits all the data.
What do we know?
We know dark matter doesn’t emit light (nor does it absorb or reflect
it), so it can’t be made of rogue planets or clouds of normal matter. We
know it’s “cold” (which in physics-speak means it moves slowly compared
with the speed of light). We know it has gravity. We also know it
doesn’t interact very strongly with anything, even itself – otherwise
the dark matter would collapse into flat structures such as galaxies,
rather than the spherical haloes we detect.
Oh, and it makes up about 27% of the universe
.
What could dark matter be?
.
What could dark matter be?
The bottom line is it is probably some new kind of particle (or a whole
family of particles) that we have never detected before. Dark matter
particles could be all around you, and floating through your body right
this second.
This means the answer to this grand cosmological
puzzle, affecting the universe on scales of mllions of light years,
could lie in the physics of tiny particles, much smaller than an atom.
Over the past 30 years physicists have sifted through dozens of
different dark matter candidates. The prime suspect at the moment is a
kind of particle called a weakly interacting massive particle, or WIMP.
This is a kind of heavy particles that feel only the weak force.
One of the goals of CERN’s Large Hadron Collider is to look for WIMPs
(the same way it found the Higgs Boson in 2013) – the elusive dark
matter particles might be created when protons are smashed together at
near the speed of light.
Can we detect dark matter?
Besides CERN, there are more than 30 experiments around the world devoted to finding dark matter.
Some of these are dedicated telescopes searching for the signature of
particles created when two particles of dark matter annihilate.
Others are giant vats of liquid xenon watching for a telltale flash when a dark matter particle nudges an atomic nucleus. None has yet made a convincing detection of a dark matter particle, although some of the experiments have ruled out various possibilities of what dark matter might be.
Others are giant vats of liquid xenon watching for a telltale flash when a dark matter particle nudges an atomic nucleus. None has yet made a convincing detection of a dark matter particle, although some of the experiments have ruled out various possibilities of what dark matter might be.
It remains a possibility that dark matter may never be
directly detectable – especially if it turns out to be a particle that
does not even feel the weak force.
The dark force and dark photons
Some physicists have proposed that dark matter particles can interact with one another via a new force of nature – called, yes, the dark force and transmitted by dark photons (aka dark radiation).
There may even be different kinds of dark matter, some of which feels the dark force, and some do not.
Some physicists have proposed that dark matter particles can interact with one another via a new force of nature – called, yes, the dark force and transmitted by dark photons (aka dark radiation).
There may even be different kinds of dark matter, some of which feels the dark force, and some do not.
Dark energy
How was dark energy discovered?
In the early 20th century, physicists including Albert Einstein
imagined the universe as static and unchanging. But in 1929 American
astronomer Edwin Hubble observed the motions of exploding stars and
discovered the universe was expanding. In fact the universe must have
had a beginning – a moment of creation called the big bang.
We
can imagine the big bang a bit like an explosion. But after that initial
burst, physicists thought the expansion should begin to slow down over
time, as gravity acted to pull everything back to a single point again.
The question was whether the universe would ever stop expanding and reverse direction, falling back into a “big crunch”.
Then, in 1998, things got a bit more complicated.
Using the same method as Edwin Hubble (and with the telescope named
after him) astronomers found that the expansion of the universe was not
slowing down, but instead was accelerating. Galaxies are flying away
from each other faster and faster each year.
It was a strange and
unexpected result. A bit like if you were driving on a flat highway,
took your foot off the accelerator – and then your car began to speed
up!
Yet the data were convincing. Physicists realised this
expansion must be driven by some sort of energy, and they called it
“dark energy”.
What we know
We know that dark energy
affects the universe as a whole. We know it acts a bit like a negative
gravity pushing galaxies away from one another.
We also know that
dark energy did not kick in until a few billion years ago. (For the
first half of its life, the expansion of the universe was slowing down
due to gravity pulling everything together.)
This makes
physicists think dark energy is somehow tied up with space itself. This
means its density in space is always the same, but as the universe
expands (that is as more space is created), the amount of dark energy
also increases.
This would explain why the amount of dark energy was insignificant when the universe was small.
What could it be?
The answer to the mystery
of dark energy might also lie in the minuscule quantum realm.
In quantum theory, “empty space” is not empty at all, but filled with a soup of particles continually popping into and out of existence. As weird as it sounds, physicists have actually measured the force created by these so-called “virtual particles” in the lab.
In quantum theory, “empty space” is not empty at all, but filled with a soup of particles continually popping into and out of existence. As weird as it sounds, physicists have actually measured the force created by these so-called “virtual particles” in the lab.
The problem
is, when physicists try to calculate how much energy these virtual
particles contribute to each cubic metre of empty space, they come out
with a number that’s a factor of 10120 too large when compared to the
density of dark energy (as measured from the accelerated expansion of
the universe). That's a 1 with 120 zeroes after it, a ludicrous answer
called “the worst theoretical prediction in the history of physics”.
Quintessence
Some physicists think dark energy could be akin to a fifth force of
nature, pervading all of space. They call it “quintessence”, after the
fifth element predicted by the Greek philosophers. As opposed to the
cosmological constant, the quintessence is imagined to change over time –
it was once attractive, but is now repulsive.
The big rip and phantom dark energy
In some theories, the quintessence can continue to grow stronger (in which case it’s called phantom dark energy).
This could destroy the universe.
If the expansion of the universe continues to accelerate, eventually
reach the speed of light – first galaxies and stars would be cut off
from one another, then eventually the space between the sun and the
Earth would expand faster than the speed of light and individual atoms
would be torn asunder as the space within them expanded at faster than
the speed of light. This is the big rip.
A new gravity?
Dark energy might not be a new force, it might just be a sign that, at
very large scales, gravity does not behave as Einstein’s theory of
general relatively describes.
The ΛCDM (lambda cold dark matter) model
This is the name for the astrophysicists’ current best picture of the way the cosmos is screwed together.
Λ (or lambda) stands for dark energy, while cold dark matter describes
the consensus that dark matter must be made up of some kind of slow
moving, previously unknown particle.
In this picture, dark matter
makes up 27% of the mass-energy of the universe, dark energy makes up
about 68%, and ordinary matter – that of the stars and galaxies and our
own flesh and blood – makes up less than 5%.
thanks
Cecile G. Tamura
தமிழ் தான் முதன் மொழி தமிழர் தான் மூத்த மாந்த இனம்.
தமிழர்கள் கிறித்துவராக மாற்றப்பட்டனர் என்பதை ஏற்கும் கூட்டம்........
தமிழர்கள் இன்னும் பல மதங்களாக மாற்றப்பட்டதை ஏற்கும் கூட்டம்.......
தமிழர்கள் இந்துவாக மாற்றப்பட்டனர் என்பதை ஏன் ஏற்க மறுக்கிறது.
காரணம் அதில் இருக்கும் வழிபாட்டு/பண்பாட்டு முறைகள்.ஒன்றை தமிழர்கள் தெளிவாக புரிந்து கொள்ள வேண்டும்.
உலக மதங்களில் இனங்களில் மொழிகளில், கலைகளில் பண்பாடுகளில் எல்லாவற்றிலும் தமிழ்/தமிழர் தாக்கம் இருக்கும். காரணம் தமிழ் தான் முதன் மொழி தமிழர் தான் மூத்த மாந்த இனம்.
இசுலாம் கிறித்து இன்னும் பிற மதங்கள் வேறு நிலப்பரப்பில் இருந்து தமிழர் நிலப்பரப்பினுள் நுழைந்து தமிழரை மதமாற்றம் செய்தது.
ஆனால் இந்து என்று இன்று அழைக்கப்படும் ஆரிய கோட்பாட்டின் கருத்தியல் மதம், தமிழர் பாரம்பரியம், பண்பாடு, மொழி, கலை போன்றவற்றை நம் நிலப்பரப்பில் இருந்துகொண்டே, அதை களவாடி(திருடி) பின் திரித்து(ஆரிய கோட்பாடை கலந்து) நம்மிடம் திணிக்கப்பட்டது.எனவேதான் தமிழர் நாம் இயல்பாகவே தொன்றுதொட்டே நம்மை இந்துக்கள் என்று எண்ணி ஏமாந்து வாழ்கிறோம்.
இதையெல்லாம் அறிந்து தெளிந்து எடுத்துரைத்தால், தமிழர்களே அதற்கு எதிராக நிற்பது, 1800 ஆண்டுக்கும் மேல் அடிமைபட்டு, அடிமைக்கும் அடிமையாகிப் போன நிலை தந்த அறியாமையே.
என் பாட்டன் சொன்னார் என் அப்பன் சொன்னார் என்று நான் மாற மாட்டேன் நான் இப்படித்தான் வாழ்வேன் என்னும் சில வாதங்கள் வேதனைக்குரிய ஒன்று.
நம் பாட்டனும் அப்பனும் அறியாத வரலாற்றை நாம் மீட்டெடுத்துக் கொண்டிருக்கின்றோம் என்பதை உணர்ந்து தெளி என் தமிழினமே.
தொன்றுதொட்டு வந்ததை மாற்றிக்கொள்ள மாட்டேன் என்று மடமையில் விழுந்து உன் இனம் அழிய நீயே வழிகாட்டாதே.
மலேசிய வரலாறுபடி 200 ஆண்டுக்கு முன் அடிமையாய் இந்த நாட்டுக்கு வந்தோம் என்கிறான். எனவே நான் அடிமையாய் வந்தேன் அடிமையாய் தான் இருப்பேன் என்றால் அது சரியா?
200 ஆண்டுதானா உன் வரலாறு?
உன் பாட்டன்கள் பாண்டிய சேர சோழன் காலத்தில் நீ உலகை ஆண்டவனான். நீ அடிமையா?
2000 ஆண்டுக்கு முன் வாழ்ந்த வள்ளுவன்
6000 ஆண்டுக்கு முன் வாழ்ந்த தொல்காப்பியன்
இவர்கள் தமிழரா இந்துவா?
இதற்கு பதிலுண்டா உன்னிடம். புரிந்துகொள், நீ 50,000 ஆண்டுக்கும் மூத்த நீண்ட நெடிய வரலாறு கொண்ட மாபேரும் தமிழர் எனும் தேசிய இனம்.
இனியும் நீ எழாவிட்டால், !!!!!????!!!!
எழு.. மதத்தை தூரப்போடு
குலத்தில் ஏற்றதாழ்வை தூக்கிப்போடு
இனம் மீள விடுதலை வெல்ல
உன் களப்பணியை
"செய்.... அல்லது செத்துமடி.....
(அழகை இர சுந்தர்)
Monday, June 13, 2016
Church of Euthanasia இது நம்புவதற்கு கடினமாக இருக்கும் ஆனால் முற்றிலும் உண்மை..
இந்த உலகத்தில் மக்கள் தொகை தொடர்ந்து உயர்ந்து கொண்டே வருகிறது...
இப்படியே போனால் நமக்கு பின்னர் வரும் நமது தலைமுறைக்கு இந்த உலகத்தில் நீர் உணவு தானியங்கள் அசைவம் எதுவுமே கிடைக்காது ...
இப்போது உள்ள மக்கள் தொகையை காட்டிலும் நமது சந்தியினர் காலத்தில் மூன்று மடங்கு அதிகமாக மனிதர்கள் இருப்பார்கள்...
அந்த மக்கள் அணைவரும் பசியால் பட்டினியால் செத்து மடிவதை தவிர வேறு வழியில்லை...
ஆகவே மக்களே இந்த காலத்தில் வாழும் நாம் நமது தலைமுறைக்கு வழிவிடுவோம் அவர்களையும் நாம் வாழ வைப்போம்
நாம் தான் இந்த உலகில் அதிபுத்திசாலி எப்படி தெரியுமா ?
பின்னர் வர இருக்கும் இறப்புக்கு இப்பவே முடிவெடுக்கிறோம்
ஆகவே மக்களே இந்த உலகத்தில் மக்கள் தொகையை கட்டுப்படுத்த அரசாங்கம் தேவையில்லை நாமே முடிவெடுப்போம் இப்பவே முடிவெடுப்போம்...
இன்றைய மக்கள் தொகையை கட்டுப்படுத்த நீங்கள் ஒவ்வொருவரும் தற்கொலை செய்து கொள்ளுங்கள்...
இது தான் அந்த முடிவு.
இப்படி தான் ஒவ்வொரு முறையும் பிரசாரம் செய்ய பட்டது
இவர்கள் church of ethunasia என்கிற மதத்தவர்கள்...
இவர்களை COE என்றும் அழைக்கப்படும்
மேலே சொன்ன முட்டாள் தனமான கொள்கையை கையிலெடுத்து பிரச்சாரம் செய்தார்கள்..
இதைவிட பெரிய கொடுமை என்னவென்றால்...
நீங்கள் நம்பித்தான் ஆகவேண்டும் !
உலகத்தில் ஆடு கோழி மீன் போன்றவைகள் நாம் சாப்பிடுவதால் பின் வரும் தலைமுறைக்கு அசைவமே இருக்காதாம் அதனால்
அசைவம் வேண்டும் என்பவர்கள் மனிதர்களை கொலை செய்து
சாப்பிடுங்கள் என்றனர்
சாப்பிடுங்கள் என்றனர்
ஆண் பெண் உறவு வைத்துக் கொள்ளக்கூடாது
ஆணும் ஆணும் உறவு வைத்துக் கொள்வது அனுமதித்தனர்
காரணம் குழந்தை பிறப்பை ஓழிக்க வேண்டும் என்பதால்..
இவ்வளவையும் செய்தவர்கள் அமெரிக்கர்கள் தான் அங்கே தான் இந்த கேடுகெட்ட மதம் உருவானது..
இதன் விளைவாக பல அப்பாவி மக்கள் தற்கொலை செய்து கொண்டனர்
சில நல்ல அமைப்புகள் இதெல்லாம் தவறு தற்கொலை என்னத்தை கைவிடுங்கள் என்று வீதியெங்கும் பிரசாரம் செய்தனர்.
இன்றைய தினத்தில் இந்த மதம் தடைசெய்யப்பட்ட ஒன்றாக இருந்தாலும் மறைமுகமாக பிரசாரம் செய்கின்றனர் என்பது தான் உண்மை....
The Church of Euthanasia is a non-profit educational foundation devoted to
restoring balance between Humans and the remaining species on Earth. We
believe this can only be accomplished by a massive voluntary population reduction,
which will require a leap in Human consciousness to a new species awareness.
The Human population is increasing by one million every four days. This
is a net increase of 95 million per year, the current population of Mexico.
Even major wars or epidemics hardly dent this rate of growth, and modern
wars also have tremendous environmental consequences. It is for these practical
reasons, as well as moral ones, that we support only voluntary forms of population
reduction.
The Church has only one commandment, and it is "Thou Shalt Not Procreate."
In addition, we have four "pillars" or principles, which are Suicide, Abortion,
Cannibalism and Sodomy.
Note that cannibalism is only required for those who insist on eating flesh,
and is strictly limited to consumption of the already dead. Also note that
sodomy is defined as any sexual act not intended for procreation: fellatio,
cunnilingus, and anal sex are all forms of sodomy and are still illegal in
some parts of the United States.
The web site contains everything the Church has ever released, including
all issues of Snuff It (complete with color photos and graphics), the complete
e-sermons, a resources page with links to Church-approved sites, and an on-line
catalog with an order form. This is the best way to experience the Church
on-line, particularly if your browser supports graphics. The web site URL
is http://churchofeuthanasia.org.
The Church of Euthanasia merchandise is no longer available. It was a very
successful form of outreach for almost 10 years, but eventually the product
line aged, national distributors lost interest, and the merchandise was no
longer self-sustaining. Plus we got sick of packing boxes. We apologize
for any inconvenience.
If you choose to not procreate, you're a member already. Membership implies a
lifetime vow to not procreate. Procreation means guaranteed excommunication.
There are no exceptions; abortion will be required, period. Of course,
such difficulties can be avoided by faithful adherence to the fourth pillar
(sodomy).
Of course you don't have to kill yourself! If you really want to, though,
wait until after you've joined the Church. That way, you automatically become
a saint, without any additional paperwork. Don't forget to leave a note
thanking and/or blaming the Church, and feel free to will us your estate,
if you have one.
Absolutely! So long as you don't have any more. We have a number of members
with children, and we even have a member whose son joined too. What's done
is done. What matters is your commitment now.
The most important way you can help is by not procreating. If you feel comfortable
taking the lifetime vow, then you should consider officially joining the
Church. It would also very helpful if you could manage to abstain from eating
non-human flesh.
You could also make a tax-deductible donation. The Church is exempt from
federal income tax under 501(a) and 501(c)(3), EIN 04-324-9910.
Finally, you can help by spreading the word. Talk to people. Proselytize
shamelessly. Write a letter to the editor of your local paper. Get on the radio
or TV. Be a nuisance. Cause trouble. Piss people off, especially your
breeding friends. Carpe diem.
Please consult the alt.suicide.holiday website.
I'll kill myself when I feel like it. Suicide is OPTIONAL.
Maybe if people stopped having so many babies, we could build a compassionate,
sustainable future, and I wouldn't want to kill myself anymore. Just kidding!
The Church has thousands of official members who've formally taken the
vow on non-procreation, plus clergy, directors, and thousands more "e-members" and supporters around the world.
All text and images on the Church of Euthanasia website are licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Rev. Chris Korda's music is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.
Humans with blood type Rh Negative belong to an Extraterrestrial lineage according to new theory
Humans have possible four general blood types: A, B, AB and O; this
classification is derived, according to scientists from proteins which
are found on the surface of cells which are designed to fight off
bacteria and viruses in the human body. The vast majority of humans
beings on this planet have these proteins which means they are Rh
positive. But a minor group, the Rh Negative lacks these proteins. So
how is this crucial difference explained scientifically? And why does it
even exist? Throughout the years, several scientific studies have
searched for this answer.
Now, scientists believe they have found out a fascinating thing in
regards of Rh Positive and negative. According to this “scientific”
theory, in the distant past, extraterrestrial beings visited the Earth
and created, through “genetic manipulation,” the Rh Negative with an
intention of creating a race of “slaves”.
The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of
Rh negative blood. About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry
one (r) negative gene.
But Aliens… really? According to investigators, this would explain
why Rh negative mothers do not tolerate fetuses with RH Positive blood;
thus, this radical, hard-to-explain, by most natural laws intolerance
could derive from an ancient genetic modification why Rh positive and Rh
negative groups tend to “repel” each other instead of merging.
This theory goes back to ancient Sumerian times when a highly
advanced “alien” race came from elsewhere in the cosmos; The Anunnaki,
building and creating the first human societies.
It is believed that these ancient beings planned and genetically
altered primitive human species, creating stronger and more “adequate”
beings that were used as slaves in the distant past.
The Rh negative would be the legacy that the Anunnaki left on Earth
among other things. Interestingly, the negative RH strain is
characteristic, for example, of the British royal family, which has
generated controversial theories about a possible extraterrestrial
lineage. although this hypothesis has not been confirmed, the disturbing
questions it generates floats in the air: how civilized world would
react to the fact that a small portion of the Earth’s population has a
genetic code that has been altered in the distant past by highly
advanced extraterrestrial beings.
What if it is possible, after all of our “skeptical” views that in
the end, the Negative Rh group of people have a connection to “beings”
not from earth. What if there still is, a mysterious bond that connects
them? How would life on Earth change?
Genesis 6:2 “The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and took them wives, all of which they chose.”
Genesis 6:4 “God came into the daughters of men, and
they bare children to them, and the same became mighty of old.” From
the King James Bible: “menchildren – men of Israel, male children of
God, not children of man – Ex. 34:23.” Ex. 34:7 states “The iniquity of the father will be unto the children unto the fourth generation.”
About Author
Ivan
Ivan is a freelance writer,
editor-in-chief of ancient-code.com, he also writes for EWAO, Share
Knowledge, Svemir Online and Ancient Origins.History, Archaeology, Space and world’s mysteries are some of the topics he writes about.
நபி (ஸல்) அவர்கள் மஸ்ஜிதுல் அக்ஸாவில் தொழுத இடம்
அபூதர் அல்கிஃபாரீ (ரலி) அவர்கள் கூறியதாவது:
நான் (நபி (ஸல்) அவர்களிடம்) "அல்லாஹ்வின் தூதரே! பூமியில் முதன் முதலாக அமைக்கப்பெற்ற பள்ளிவாசல் எது?'' என்று கேட்டேன். அதற்கு அவர்கள், "அல் மஸ்ஜிதுல் ஹராம் (மக்கா நகரிலுள்ள புனித கஅபா அமைந்திருக்கும்) பள்ளிவாசல்'' என்று பதிலளித்தார்கள். நான் "பிறகு எது?'' என்று கேட்டேன். அவர்கள் "(ஜெரூசஸலத்திலுள்ள) அல்மஸ்ஜிதுல் அக்ஸா'' என்று பதிலளித்தார்கள். நான், "அவ்விரண்டுக்குமிடையே எத்தனை ஆண்டுக் காலம் (இடைவெளி இருந்தது)?'' என்று கேட்டேன். அவர்கள் "நாற்பதாண்டுகள்' (-மஸ்ஜிதுல்
ஹராம் அமைக்கப்பெற்று நாற்பதாண்டுகள் கழித்து மஸ்ஜிதுல் அக்ஸா
அமைககப்பெற்றது). (பின்னர்) உங்களைத் தொழுகை (நேரம்) எங்கே வந்தடைகிறதோ
அங்கு நீங்கள் தொழுதுகொள் ளுங்கள்! ஏனெனில், அதுதான் இறைவனை வழிபடும் தலம் (மஸ்ஜித்) ஆகும்'' என்று கூறினார்கள்
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)