Search This Blog

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

TIPS TO BECOMING CEO



How do those who are at the top rise to the top to begin with? Becoming your own boss does not have to be merely a dream. Here are 8 tips to turn your desire into reality.

How to Become Your Own Boss


If you want to start a business but don’t know where to start, don’t worry–you are not alone. In fact, given the new economic reality of our time, more people than ever before have found the “job” they thought was waiting for them doesn’t exist. Others have come to the conclusion that they would rather create work they love, constructed to fit with their own life goals. No matter what the motivation is to be your own boss, you can start today.

Take a Stand for Yourself.
If you are dissatisfied with your current circumstances, admit that no one can fix them except for you. It doesn’t do any good to blame the economy, your boss, your spouse or your family. Change can only occur when you make a conscious decision to make it happen.
Identify the Right Business for You.
Give yourself permission to explore. Be willing to look at different facets of yourself (your personality, social styles, age) and listen to your intuition. We tend to ignore intuition even though deep down we often know the truth. Ask yourself “What gives me energy even when I’m tired?”
How do you know what business is “right” for you? There are three common approaches to entrepreneurship:
Do What You Know: Have you been laid off or want a change? Look at work you have done for others in the past and think about how you could package those skills and offer them as your own services or products.
Do What Others Do: Learn about other businesses that interest you. Once you have identified a business you like, emulate it.
Solve a Common Problem: Is there a gap in the market? Is there a service or product you would like to bring to market? (Note: This is the highest-risk of the three approaches.) If you choose to do this, make sure that you become a student and gain knowledge first before you spend any money.

10 EASIEST WAYS TO SAVE MONEY EACH MONTH




As the economy continues to plummet it might be a good idea to begin pinching pennies. These tips may seem obvious, but you would be surprised by how easy it is to cut costs and how little you really will be sacrificing. Try these ideas to build wealth instead of lose it!
Moneyning.com recommends…
1. Cell Phone – Remember megetting a few hundred dollars for switching cell phone carriers? What I didn’t mention is that many people are starting to look into prepaid plans as well. The per minute cost may be high but if you never experienced having your ears burn because you talk too much on the phone, you probably can save some money by paying as you go.
2. Home Phone – I don’t have a home phone and I have no idea why the business model still exists. Do you have one still? That’s so 1980s…
3. Internet – Have you looked into the different technology (and thus, options) available to you? Could you actually buy an Internet capable phone and hook it up to a PC (a feature known as tethering) to get essentially the same service for a fraction of the cost?
4. TV – The case is made countless times but I bet many of you still pay way too much for your favorite shows. There are many legal ways to watch TV online like hulu.com and if you are a movie buff, there’s always the idea of using a Netflix coupon to get some free service.
5. Gym Membership – Gym? Do you actually go? Most people are going after a healthy and fit body instead of becoming a muscle man (or lady). The fittest people are always the ones who go out to jog every day. They run on the road, on the beach and in the parks. You don’t need to smell other people’s sweat and pay a bunch of money just to stay fit right?
6. Clubs, Newsletters, Subscriptions – Enough said. Unless they provide real value, stop paying for it.
7. Electricity – Many tricks we know, but in order to save money every month, we have to change our habits. Turn off the lights and electronics whenever it’s not needed, dial down the water heater to 112 degrees, open the windows instead of using A/C are all simple ways to not only save but to put less strain on the overall environment.
8. Pills – It’s easy to switch your subscriptions to generic brands and best of all, it’s almost always cheaper. (Stole this tip from Frugal Dad. Check out his list at the bottom of the post)
9. Cars – Oil changes and regular maintenance may be out of your league but wash your own cars. Please.
10. Insurance Companies – Call the representatives regularly and see if there is a better deal (remember their competition as well). If everyone does this, it may even create more jobs.

wOrld's mOst eXpensive car :: citrOen


`


 

A Visit to Google Headquarters



 VISIT TO GOOGLE HEADQUARTERS...........    

 Do ya think sometimes you work in the wrong place???!!!   

          
Moving around: A slide allows quick access from different floors ... 
There are also poles available ... they are similar to the ones used in fire stations. 



Food. Employees can eat all they want  
from a vast choice of food and drink. 



Workstation: Each employee has at least two large screens. There are 4-6 'Zooglers' per office. 



     INNOVATION:  Large boards are available almost everywhere because 'ideas don't always come when seated in the office' says one of Googles managers. 



LEISURE. Pool tables, video games etc. are  available in many areas. 



Communication... On each floor, there are private cabin areas where employees can attend to personal affairs. 



Technical Support: Problem with your computer ?  No problem ...Bring it to this area where drinks are available while it is being fixed ... 



Health: Professional masseurs (iusses)  available. 



REST ... This room provides massage chairs that you control .... while you view relaxing aquariums ... !!!  



Ambiance ... There are many books in this library .. even some about programming !! My question  ....
When do they work ...? 
How much do they pay employees to work there ..?   

A change in perspective could be all it takes to succeed in school



 Psychology & Psychiatry 
Knowing the right way to handle stress in the classroom and on the sports field can make the difference between success and failure for the millions of students going back to school this fall, new University of Chicago research shows.
"We found that cortisol, a hormone released in response to stress, can either be tied to a student's poor performance on a math test or contribute to success, depending on the frame of mind of the student going into the test," said Sian Beilock, associate professor in psychology at UChicago and one of the nation's leading experts on poor performance by otherwise talented people.
She is the author of "Choke: What the Secrets of the Brain Reveal About Getting it Right When You Have To," released this month in paperback.
In a new paper published in the current issue of the journal "Emotion," Beilock and her colleagues explore the topic of performance failure in math and show, for the first time, that there is a critical connection between working memory, math anxiety and salivary cortisol.
Working memory is the mental reserve that people use to process information and figure out solutions during tests. Math anxiety is fear or apprehension when just thinking about taking a math test. Cortisol is a hormone produced by the adrenal gland and associated with stress-related changes in the body; it is often referred to as the "stress hormone."
Tracking math anxiety in students
Beilock and her team tested 73 undergraduate students to determine their working memory capacities and their level of math anxiety. They also measured cortisol levels (via a saliva sample) before and after a stressful math test. They published the results in a paper titled "Choke or Thrive? The Relation between Salivary Cortisol and Math Performance Depends on Individual Differences in Working Memory and Math Anxiety."
Among students with low working memories, there was little difference in performance related to either cortisol production or math anxiety, the study found. Students with lower working memory exert relatively less mental effort to begin with, researchers found, so taking a stressful test didn't drastically compromise their performance.
Among people with large working memories, those who were typically the most talented, rising cortisol either led to a performance boost or a performance flop — depending on whether they were already anxious about math. For students without a fear of math, the more their cortisol increased during the test, the better they performed — for these confident students, the body's response to stress actually pushed them to greater heights. In contrast, for students with more anxiety about math, surging cortisol was tied to poor performance.
"Under stress, we have a variety of bodily reactions; how we interpret these reactions predicts whether we will choke or thrive under pressure," Beilock said. "If a student interprets their physiological response as a sign they are about to fail, they will. And, when taking a math test, students anxious about math are likely to do this. But the same physiological response can also be linked to success if a student's outlook is positive," she further explained.
In other words, a student's perspective can determine success or failure. Students can change their outlooks by writing about their anxieties before a test and "off-loading" their fears, or simply thinking about a time in the past when they have succeeded, her research has shown.
Taking an exam brings on a different kind of pressure than when a student recites a memorized speech before classmates or an athlete plays before a packed stadium, other research by Beilock and her team demonstrates.
Why people choke under pressure
In another paper published this month in the "Journal of Experimental Psychology," Beilock and her colleagues identify, for the first time, different ways in which people can fumble under pressure. They also suggest remedies. The work, which was based on a series of experiments with several hundred undergraduate students in varying stressful situations, is reported in the paper "Choking Under Pressure: Multiple Routes to Skill Failure."
The experiments explored two theories of why people choke: One holds that people are distracted by worries, and as a result, fail to access their talents; another conversely proposes that stress causes people to pay too much attention to their performance and become self-conscious.
"What we showed in these experiments is that the situation determines what kind of choking develops. Knowing this can help people choose the right strategy to overcome the problem," Beilock said.
In the case of test-taking, good test preparation and a writing exercise can boost performance by reducing anxiety and freeing up working memory. The kind of choking prompted by performing before others calls for a different remedy.
"When you're worried about doing well in a game, or giving a memorized speech in front of others, the best thing to do is to distract yourself with a little tune before you start so you don't become focused on all the details of what you've done so many times before," she said. "On the playing field, thinking too much can be a bad thing," she further explained.
Provided by University of Chicago
"A change in perspective could be all it takes to succeed in school." August 9th, 2011. http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-08-perspective-school.html
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek

Stress genes out of kilter

 
Stress genes out of kilterPeople suffering from chronic stress are more likely to develop alcoholism. Credit: Altmann/pixelio.de
(Medical Xpress) -- Scientists from the Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine in Göttingen have investigated genetic variations of the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) system, the biological stress axis, in schizophrenia patients. This system, which consists of various signalling molecules and the receptor structures that interact with them on the cell surface, plays a crucial role in the individual stress response. Hannelore Ehrenreich and her team have demonstrated for the first time an interaction between genetic variants within the CRF system, which show a high predictive value for the risk of comorbid alcoholism.
Alcoholism is a serious and incurable disease that affects up to 20% of the adult population in industrialised countries. The term alcoholism refers to both the serious abuse of alcohol and dependence on it. “The treatment of alcoholism is hampered by an extremely high relapse rate following physical detoxification and even many months of abstinence,” explains Hannelore Ehrenreich, Head of the Division of Clinical Neuroscience at the Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine.
Rates of alcoholism well in excess of 30% arise in people who suffer from chronic diseases, for example serious skin diseases, rheumatism, schizophrenia and depression. “It is not difficult to imagine how, in addition to an already debilitating underlying illness, alcoholism has disastrous effects on the disease progression and the patient’s individual situation,” says the physician.
Serious disease is an enormous strain on the patient that may be equated with a severe chronic stress situation. The development of comorbid alcoholism under these circumstances can be evaluated, therefore, as an ill-fated attempt to cope with the stress. As an easily accessible substance, alcohol is used by patients as form of self-treatment which helps them to deal with the effects of internal and external stress and negative emotions.
The genetic configuration of the biological stress axis, in particular the CRF (corticotropin releasing factor) system, constitutes a crucial factor in the individual response to stress. The essential components of this system include the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) itself, a hormone formed predominantly in the hypothalamus, its receptors (CRFR), meaning the specific binding sites on the surface of the cell that transmit the effects of CRF, and a CRF-binding protein (CRFBP), the function of which is to capture any excess CRF that may be produced.
The balance between the receptor (CRFR) and the CRF-binding protein (CRFBP), which both compete for the binding of the hormone, plays a key role in the level of the stress response generated by an individual. “Targeted prophylactic and therapeutic measures could be taken if we knew in advance how pronounced a person’s stress response is and, therefore, how high the risk is that he or she will develop alcoholism under the corresponding conditions,” says Ehrenreich.
Katja Ribbe and her colleagues from the Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine in Göttingen addressed this particular question. To this end, they examined patients from the GRAS (Göttingen Research Association for Schizophrenia) data pool who suffer from schizophrenia. “Schizophrenic patients basically served as a 'model population' of chronically stressed people for this scientific study. Based on this model population, we wanted to examine whether there is a correlation between genetic variants within the CRF system and a predisposition for alcoholism,” explains Ribbe.
The scientists actually succeeded for the first time in demonstrating the existence of such an interaction. Certain genetic variants of the CRF system, that is CRFR1 and CRFBF in combination, have a high diagnostic value regarding the risk of developing comorbid alcoholism. Moreover, the authors of the study replicated their findings in a small control group of patients with other psychiatric disorders. The researchers conclude from their findings that the risk constellation they discovered can probably be applied to chronically stressed persons and other groups of diseases in general.
“In the named risk constellation, the genetic variants of CRFR1 and CRFBP cause the balance between the receptor and binding protein to be set in such a way that a hyperactive stress axis arises spontaneously,” says Ehrenreich: “In other words, people who have this genetic combination are practically always more strongly ‘wired’ and are at far greater risk of developing comorbid alcoholism than people with every other combination of these genotypes.”
Therefore, based on this study, in future it will be possible to identify patients at risk and treat them with the relevant prophylactic and therapeutic measures. “This study basically represents a prototypical step towards the future development of individualised therapeutic approaches,” notes Ehrenreich.
More information: Ribbe K, et al., Prediction of the risk of comorbid alcoholism in schizophrenia by interaction of common genetic variants in the corticotropin releasing factor system. Archives of General Psychiatry, online August 1, 2011 . doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.100
Provided by Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
"Stress genes out of kilter." August 9th, 2011. http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-08-stress-genes-kilter.html
Comment:
Start with a balanced individual, add a psychoactive substance...what can the result possibly be?
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek

The universe in your skull





Pradeep Ramanathan, assistant professor of communication sciences, with a scan of his own brain.
Credit: Daniel Buttrey/UConn
In the mid-1990s, Pradeep Ramanathan was working at the technology company Intel in California’s Silicon Valley. With a background in physics and engineering, he was successful in his job, but he had an insistent feeling that he was “caught in a rat race,” as he says.
On a whim, he took a career test, which told him he should be a speech pathologist.
Now, almost 15 years later, he is an assistant professor of communication sciences in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, conducting research on memory and traumatic brain injuries. Despite twists and turns along the way, like taking coursework in Southeast Asian studies and his native language Tamil at Berkeley, singing in operas, and becoming an advanced meditation practitioner, Ramanathan has gone from engineer to speech pathologist to college professor—and never looked back.
“I just kind of fell into this,” he says. “I love the brain, and that’s what brought me here.”
After leaving his job at Intel, Ramanathan enrolled in the speech pathology graduate program at the University of Minnesota and then began working in a stroke center at a local hospital. Seeing so many patients with brain injuries convinced him he wanted to help these people in a substantive way.
Today, Ramanathan studies traumatic brain injuries, which occur when some physical impact affects the brain’s normal function. No matter how or where a person is hit in the head—whether a soldier who is harmed in battle or a person who slips on ice—certain parts of the brain are more frequently injured than others, he says.
“When you get hit in the head, the frontal lobes are very often affected, and that’s where much of the self-regulation of behavior and sociobehavioral interactions takes place,” Ramanathan says.
Among the problems that can arise from these injuries are changes in what is called metamemory, which involves the awareness and control of one’s own memory processes.
“People with traumatic brain injuries are often not as aware of how bad their memory has become,” says Ramanathan. “The ability to encode and retrieve information is often impaired in these patients. And on top of that, they may have reduced awareness of this memory impairment, which in turn means they may be less inclined to do something about it.”
Issues with metamemory can become serious problems: for example, a person may be so sure of their memory that they don’t think they need a reminder to take their medications, and then they forget to do so.
Ramanathan’s work examines aspects of this phenomenon using experiments in his laboratory. Subjects with and without brain injuries are asked to remember a series of pairs of words, and then asked how confident they are that they will remember them for a test. These metamemory judgments provide a window into individuals’ awareness of their memory performance.
To determine whether or not metamemory is related to skills like planning, reasoning, and problem solving, Ramanathan compares subjects’ ratings of their confidence in their memory to standardized tests of these functions. He has recently found that certain types of planning skills seem to be correlated with the ability to make metamemory judgments. But interestingly, individuals with traumatic brain injury seem to have difficulty applying these planning skills when they attempt to make such metamemory judgments.
“We want to figure out how people with traumatic brain injuries could get better and more realistic in their assessments of their own memory,” Ramanathan says. 
He is also interested in what makes us remember things more or less easily. For example, scientists know that seeing, say, an upright piano will make you more quickly identify the piano subsequently. But Ramanathan and his colleagues found in 2010 that if you had instead first seen a desk of similar appearance, it would make you slightly slower or less accurate in identifying the piano.
The more similar two objects are—without being identical—the more they interfere with each other in our brains. The phenomenon is called antipriming—the opposite of its predecessor, priming, and Ramanathan wants to know how it works in people with traumatic brain injuries. Currently, he is creating neural network computer models to simulate what happens in the brain during each of these experiences.
“Priming functions are surprisingly intact in many traumatic brain injury survivors,” he says. “But is their antipriming intact?”
Sometime down the road, Ramanathan would like to bring his personal passion for meditation into his work. The type of meditation he practices, called Vipassana meditation, trains the mind to focus in ways that are often disrupted in people who have brain injuries and impaired judgment. He speculates that this type of meditation could also have a positive effect on people in prisons who display impaired judgment and escalated aggression, since many of them have suffered brain injuries.
But all that’s in the future. For now, Ramanathan is happy to be out of his Silicon Valley cubicle and into a career that he says marshals all of his skills: engineering, physics, speech pathology, and even meditation.
“Everything has to do with how the brain processes information,” he says. “It’s like an entire universe in your skull.”
Provided by University of Connecticut
"The universe in your skull." August 9th, 2011. http://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-08-universe-skull.html
Comment:
Send us a dozen more like him :)
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek

ETV2 Teertha Yatra - Sri Sai Baba Mandiram - West Marredpally - 02