Search This Blog

Monday, June 6, 2011

THE TASTE OF AL FRESCO


THE TASTE OF AL FRESCO

manet.jpg
Does food really have more flavour if you eat it in the open air? Annalisa Barbieri explores the science of eating outdoors ...
The dream and the reality are never so divorced as when dining al fresco. As soon as someone says “let’s eat outdoors”, the spirits lift. The imagination fires and we picture something cold and fizzy to drink, pressed gingham napkins, vibrant salads, excellent bread that tears easily without turning into cotton wool, a flavourful Scotch egg, and platefuls of berries at that perfect stage between ripe and ruin. The sun is shining, but the table is in the shade. Nature serenades, but she does not intrude.
The reality, all too often, is that the food is average, you are too hot or too cold, there’s a bug in your drink, and you are one big bodily tic as you attempt to avoid the wasps and ants.
People in northern Europe tend to assume that in the Mediterranean everyone eats outside, dunking bullets of bread in olive oil—the men in vests like something out of a Dolce & Gabbana ad, the women all like Monica Bellucci, a plate-throw away from a sexy tantrum. I am Italian, and it is not so. We might eat outside occasionally, but mostly we consume all that nice food in the kitchen, staying firmly out of the sun, with the breeze blowing through the multi-coloured ribbons of the fly curtains.
Things happen to food in the warmth of the sun. If you’ve ever made ice cream, you’ll know it tastes more intense just before it’s frozen completely. This is because sucrose changes at molecular level when heated, which makes it seem sweeter: from fridge-cold to body temperature, it can taste almost half as sweet again. Heat also increases the concentration of volatiles—gaseous molecules given off by food that are responsible for its aroma—and their smell plays a vital role in our enjoyment of eating. We actually get two hits of smell: one through the nose, or orthonasally, the other retronasally, when the molecules from the food we’re chewing go up the nose from the back of the throat. (This is why it’s a myth that you can’t taste if your nose is blocked: you can, although the experience will be blunted.) Thus the chef Peter Gordon, in his book “Salads”, recommends putting salad dressing in the sun for a few minutes to optimise the flavours: it works a treat, as long as the breeze isn’t so fierce as to blow away the volatiles.
But unlike animals, who rely almost exclusively on their olfactory system, we expect food to appeal to our somatosensory system—touch, temperature, pain receptors (nothing spiny or too hot) and vision. And primal triggers affect us. As a species, we love a fire; it taps into something deep within us, signalling protection, warmth, the ability to cook. Picture a piece of boiled chicken, and then the same piece char-grilled on a barbecue: most of us prefer our meat with caramelised stripes.
But does all this actually make food taste better outside? “It depends on previous experiences,” says Linda Bartoshuk, director of the Human Research Centre for Taste and Smell at the University of Florida. “It wouldn’t be the same for everyone. The major effects are going to be cognitive: what seems exotic to you, what your childhood experiences are.”
Childhood does play a part, since eating outside—or at least the idea of it—seems to bring out the child in us: it feels more playful, less formal and fussy, more exciting. At the Fat Duck in Berkshire, Heston Blumenthal gets diners to listen to an iPod playing recordings of crashing waves and seagulls while they eat his shellfish dish Sound of the Sea; in recipes, he has suggested spraying pickled onion juice from an atomiser when serving fish and chips. Perhaps this is the best combination: getting a whiff of the outdoors, while staying safely inside. Maybe we should eat our picnics at home, looking out of an open window.
While barbecues and picnics are largely for weekends, many of us now get the chance to eat outside every day, by going to a café. Pavement tables, like balconies, have become far more prevalent in the past decade; even Britain, with its damp climate, now has a few tables on every shopping street, and they are not just popular with smokers. In any block of flats, there seems to be at least one balcony where the owners have crammed in a barbecue, a table and two chairs, ever optimistic. But will they be rewarded? Will their food taste better eaten on that table, on that hopeful scrap of outdoors?
Bee Wilson, the food historian and columnist, points out that many people still don’t eat outside more than occasionally. “Therefore food tastes better when they do, because they feel liberated from the constraints of a table. For most of human history the majority of people have eaten outside not through choice—a jolly Enid Blyton picnic—but because they had to. Agricultural workers have always carried their lunch to the fields. And I wonder if their food tasted better to them than it would have done under the comfort of a roof.”
Nonetheless, you can’t deny we appreciate certain foods more fully outside: a cool ice-lolly on a hot day, or a hot soup on Bonfire Night makes us stupidly grateful. We remember it, and look forward to the next time. “I think food tastes the same whether eaten inside or out,” says Herbert L. Meiselman, an American scientist who has spent much of his career with the Department of Defence Food Research programme, exploring how people choose food. “But I think your appreciation of it is different. It’s about expectation—eating outdoors is idealised—and anticipation. For example, someone going to a fancy restaurant expects to enjoy their dinner, so they probably will enjoy it.”
If our experience of eating outside is coloured by all these things—smell, anticipation, context, childhood memories, even gratitude—whether or not it really tastes better ends up being subjective. And the truth is that although the prospect of an outdoor feast is clearly part of the fun, eating outside works best impromptu: you come across good food, which you just happen to eat outside. The best food I’ve ever eaten was all eaten indoors. But some of the best experiences I’ve ever had eating were outdoors.

Annalisa Barbieri is a columnist for the Guardian and a contributor to the New StatesmanShe is the author of “Dear Annie”. Picture Credit: Manet’s “Déjeuner sur l’Herbe”

Gliders find underwater ‘rivers’


Gliders find underwater ‘rivers’
THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   

uwa_-_glider_2
"The gliders communicate with the operators via satellite to provide their position..."
Image: The University of Western Australia
Oceanographers at The University of Western Australia have discovered the first underwater ‘rivers' to be identified in a sub-tropical region flowing along the ocean bed off Perth's coastline.

The finding published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters reveals ‘rivers' or layers of dense water - what are known as dense shelf water cascades - travelling away from the shore along the seabed.

The study, led by Winthrop Professor Chari Pattiaratchi with colleagues from UWA's National Facility for Ocean Gliders and UWA's Oceans Institute, identified the ‘rivers' as slow-moving, travelling about a kilometre a day.

"The underwater ‘rivers' extend above the seabed about 20 metres occupying almost one half of the water depth.  They were detected north of Rottnest Island and extend a further 100 kilometres north along the coast," Winthrop Professor Pattiaratchi said.

"These dense shelf water cascades are common in high-latitude regions as a result of ice formation.

"But this is the first time these processes have been discovered in sub-tropical regions, and to be present throughout the year.

"South-west Australia experiences a Mediterranean climate characterised by high evaporation during summer and cooling during winter.

"Both of these processes contribute to the formation of higher density water in the shallow coastal waters during both summer and winter, which then flows offshore along the seabed forming the underwater ‘rivers'."

Professor Pattiaratchi said the underwater rivers were being studied as part of a wider project looking at their effects on phytoplankton;  to develop a better understanding of their role in carbon sequestration;  and to ascertain their actions in transporting pollutants away from the shoreline.

The underwater rivers were detected by ocean gliders operated by researchers at UWA's Australian National Facility for Ocean Gliders (ANFOG).

The gliders - which resemble mini torpedoes with wings - travel through the ocean collecting data relating to water temperature, salinity, plankton productivity, turbidity and dissolved oxygen.  They can operate non-stop in the water for up to eight months.

"The gliders change their overall density by adjusting their volume to move up and down the water column, while fins provide a dive angle to propel the gliders forward," explained ANFOG operations manager Ben Hollings of UWA's Oceans Institute, and a co-author of the paper along with researchers Mun Woo and Thisara Welhena.

"The gliders communicate with the operators via satellite to provide their positions and data collected which also allows for the operators to control the path of the glider."

Caffeine brings hallucinations


Caffeine brings hallucinations
LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   



Caffeine is the most commonly used psychoactive drug. Coffee and other caffeinated beverages such as tea, soft-drinks and energy drinks access the stimulant and when taken in large quantities increase tendencies to hallucinate says La Trobe University’s Professor Simon Crowe, School of Psychological Sciences.

In a recent study— The effect of caffeine and stress on auditory hallucinations in a non-clinical sample —Professor Crowe and colleagues measured the effect of stress and caffeine with 92 non-clinical participants.

Five coffees a day or more was found to be enough to increase the participant’s tendency to hallucinate says Professor Crowe.

‘High caffeine levels in association with high levels of stressful life events interacted to produce higher levels of ‘hallucination’ in non-clinical participants, indication that further caution needs to be exercised with the use of this overtly “safe” drug,’ he says.

The participants were assigned to either a high or a low stress condition and a high or a low caffeine condition on the basis of self-report. The participants were then asked to listen to white noise and to report each time they heard Bing Crosby’s rendition of “White Christmas” during the white noise.

The song was never played. The results indicated that the interaction of stress and caffeine had a significant effect on the reported frequency of hearing “White Christmas”. The participants with high levels of stress or consumed high levels of caffeine were more likely to hear the song.

‘There is a link between high levels of stress and psychosis, and caffeine was found to correlate with hallucination proneness. The combination of caffeine and stress affect the likelihood of an individual experiencing a psychosis-like symptom,’ says Professor Crowe.

This study also helped to explain the mechanism by which stress may facilitate the symptoms of schizophrenia in non-clinical samples. Caffeine has only recently been reported to increase proneness to hallucinate.

‘The results also support both the diathesis-stress model and the continuum theory of schizophrenia in that stress plays a role in the symptoms of schizophrenia and that everyone, to some degree, can experience these symptoms. This was demonstrated by a significant effect of stress on the occurrence of hallucinatory experiences, or hearing the song,’ says Professor Crowe.

‘It is apparent that the health risks of excessive caffeine use must be addressed and caution should be raised with regards to the exacerbating use of this stimulant,’ he says.

‘Smart bandage’ shows healing


‘Smart bandage’ shows healing
FRESH SCIENCE   

Louise_van_der_Werff_CSIRO_-_Temperature_sensitive_fibre_changing_colour
Temperature sensitive fibre changing colour.
Image: Louise van der Werff/CSIRO
Melbourne researchers have developed smart bandages that change colour to reveal the state of the wound beneath.

Their invention could reduce the $500 million cost of chronic wound care in Australia.
“We hope that the dressing could lead to more rapid and effective treatment of chronic wounds such as leg ulcers, saving time and money, as well as improving patient well-being,” says the lead inventor Louise van der Werff, a CSIRO materials scientist and Monash University PhD student.

“We’ve created a fabric that changes colour in response to temperature – showing changes of less than 0.5 of a degree. We expect that, when incorporated into a bandage it will allow nurses to quickly identify healing problems such as infection or interruptions to the blood supply, which are typically accompanied by a local increase or decrease in temperature,” she says.

So far the team has created the fabric. Within six months they’ll have turned it into a bandage, and then they’ll work with industry to trial the new bandages. A manufacturer of bandages is supporting the research.

Up to 3 per cent of Australians suffer from chronic wounds, costing the healthcare system more than $500 million each year. Reduced blood supply due to systemic diseases such as diabetes, or inflammation as a result of infection, can lead to significant delays in healing.
“If problems are not quickly identified and treated,” Louise says, “Wounds can persist for months or years resulting in a major reduction in quality of life. And the average cost of treatment is over $25,000 per wound.”

The colour-changing material the researchers have developed is in the form of a fibre, which may be woven or knitted into a loose textile product for incorporation into a wound dressing. It will allow both patients and clinicians to determine the temperature across the wound and surrounding tissue without using electronic equipment. They simply compare the colour of the fibres with a calibrated chart.

This could lead to more timely, effective and relevant treatments by doctors and nurses and to limited self-diagnosis by patients allowing faster closure of the wounds.

“Having the ability to collect a broader range of data on a wound’s status will have a significant impact on the understanding of chronic wounds and how best to treat them,” says Mr Robin Cranston, the leader of the joint research project.

Garbage in, garbage out


Garbage in, garbage out


WEEE is the fastest growing garbage problem in Europe. To make matters worse, authorities do not know where half of it ends up. At current capacity only one-third of waste electrical and electronic equipment, to give its full name, is safely discarded. Annual generation of unwanted TVs, computers, mobile phones, kettles, refrigerators and the like, far outstrips the ability to collect and recycle it. By 2020 Europeans will be creating more than 12m tonnes annually. 
A lot ends up in a landfill or the incinerator, where groundwater and atmosphere are exposed to the hazardous materials that keep gadgets ticking. Worse, some is smuggled off to developing countries where penniless labourers, often children, strip away toxic chemicals with their bare hands to salvage whatever valuable metals the nearest dealership will take.
In addition to environmental and health risks, Europe faces a supply shortage of many rare materials needed for electronic products, including cobalt, mercury and lead, which can, in theory, be recovered. It is no great surprise, then, that collection for recycling of e-waste is a major priority for EU policymakers. Laws to this end have been in force since 2004, but are regarded even by eurocrats as excessively confusing and ineffective, and are in the process of being rewritten.
Earlier this year the European Parliament voted overwhelmingly (the only opposition coming from the far-right including the British National Front and France’s Front National) in favour of ambitious increases in the amounts of discarded electronics member countries are obliged to collect for safe disposal. The proposals would also introduce stricter inspections on exported e-waste—only reusable goods can legally be exported—and shift collection costs back onto producers and retailers.
However, finding concordance among the many Brussels institutions has not proven easy. New member states complain of the financial burden such a move would impose on their fledgling capitalist economies. Retailers voice concerns about becoming dumping grounds for unwanted electrical appliances. Businesses warn of cost burdens offloaded onto consumers, who are unlikely to appreciate environmental gains they will never feel first-hand. Some of these grievances are spurious, others legitimate, but all underline scepticism that legislation can solve the issue. Ministers from the more reticent EU states obliged last month by watering down the proposals, delaying introduction of new targets and exempting East European countries from action until 2022.
Another route policymakers toyed with, albeit briefly, concerned setting businesses “eco-design requirements”. This is an intriguing idea, as a vast majority of electronic goods are a mesh of many different materials, making them incredibly difficult to separate and recycle. A central premise was to prevent producers from deliberately designing electronics which cannot be dismantled and reused. Manufacturers would be encouraged to consult with recyclers on creating devices so that materials can be recovered after use.
Such concepts have already been explored by some green-minded engineers. Aaron Engel-Hall, a member of the Stanford University team which last year created a prototype for the world’s first fully modular and recyclable laptop, explains that an entire portable computer can, theoretically, be recycled. "The most difficult step is separating the materials.” For example, Apple's MacBook is built around an aluminium shell which could be safely disposed of with general household waste. Problems arise with the embedded its glass display, rubber-padded edges and vacuum-sealed LCD screen inside.
The modular concept, known as Project Bloom, is appealing in other ways, too. Modules, such as a USB drive, circuit board or LCD screen, could be swapped in as they break or become obsolete. The laptop design is such that it can be dissembled without tools in under two minutes. Such devices could prove a boon to cash-strapped consumers, all the while making them easier to dispose of (eg, the computer can be dismantled into parts small enough to post off to recyclers).
The team is currently in talks to create an updated prototype, and claims to have recently been approached by some “major and very promising companies” interested in commercialising the idea. Similar thinking has been employed with some mobile phones and even cars, such as the modular Smart Car. But unless legislation forces electronics manufacturers to take recycling their products at end-of-use seriously, such concepts are unlikely to leave the prototype stage.
The convenient status quo was summed up by Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan, who told the European Parliament earlier this year, “Our normal understanding of ownership is that if you sell me something and I buy it from you, it is then my responsibility. There is no residual obligation on you to recycle.” Perhaps, but such devices cannot remain in the garage forever. If Europe is to crack down on illegal export of e-waste to the developing world, as it should, much more ambition will be needed. Without it, Europe's butter mountains and milk lakes could be displaced by something much more high tech
.

The cost of trade


Greenhouse gases

The cost of trade


Rich countries are outsourcing carbon dioxide emissions
WHEN a country reports its carbon emissions to the United Nations, it is the carbon dioxide that goes out of chimneys, exhaust pipes and forest fires of the country’s own territory that gets counted. But what about the carbon emitted elsewhere by people making goods that the country imports? A paper just published in PNAS by Glen Peters and colleagues looks at how the world’s carbon emissions get reapportioned when the carbon used to make traded goods and services is charged against the account of the ultimate consumer, not the initial producer. So while Europe may pride itself on emitting less carbon from its own territory than it did in 1990, from a consumption point of view the carbon embodied in imports from China alone all but cancels out the gain. In general, the study finds that net embodied carbon imports into developed countries grew from 400m tonnes in 1990 to 1.6 billion tonnes in 2008—a growth rate faster than that of the world economy or global carbon emissions. 

Don't let's waste waste


Electronic waste

Don't let's waste waste


“TO ADDRESS the problems caused by electronic waste, American businesses, government, and individuals must work together to manage these electronics throughout the product lifecycle—from design and manufacturing through their use and eventual recycling, recovery, and disposal.”
Few would question the bona fide green intent of the above statement. After all, while Babbage wrote last month that unwanted electronics have become Europe’s fastest-growing waste problem, across the Atlantic the challenge is even starker. In America, scattershot state-level policies have failed to converge on any coherent action, and precious little information exists on exactly where the country’s discarded gadgets are going.
Still, the expressed sentiment would probably carry little weight were these not the words of President Barack Obama, announcing last  November the creation of a new inter-agency e-waste task force. Mr Obama has a track record in policies for the safe disposal of hazardous materials, having sponsored a successful cross-party bill to ban American mercury exports as a Senator in 2008.
Acknowledging the scale of the e-waste challenge, the United States has turned to Solving the E-Waste Problem (StEP), an initiative run by the United Nations University (UNU), which provides a forum for scientific solutions to international policy problems. Last month the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), a founding member of the initiative, announced a new $2.5m grant to help finance the creation of the first-ever comprehensive inventory of the country’s e-waste output. Under leadership of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the National Center for Electronics Recycling, the project will directly co-operate with electronics manufacturers who, though generally happy to tally units sold, are often less rigorous in reporting those returned for recycling.
Meanwhile experts will receive more money for their efforts to track international shipments of e-waste. Though the familiar media trope is of obsolete hi-tech junk shipped off for dangerous backyard recycling, in reality many of these products are refurbished on arrival and receive a second lease of life in developing-world households. This is in principle beneficial, as otherwise unaffordable TVs and computers can help close the digital divide in the harbour cities of West Africa and South Asia. The problem is distinguishing between the two trades.
Speaking at the UNU initiative’s base in Bonn, StEP's co-founder Ruediger Kuehr said:
“There is a hunger, not just for the materials, but for re-use. But there are definitely also unscrupulous brokers about who are only interested in shipping this equipment to get, for very little money, as much as possible out of this equipment by primitively recycling precious metals.”
Establishing the true nature of old electronics shipments, as well as the quantities involved, is an enormous logistical task. It requires the co-operation of authorities in the destination cities, which is sometimes hard to come by. And StEP is also charged with assessing the facilities available at destination for safe disposal of such equipment once it reaches end of life. “Without this infrastructure in place, we have to question our approach, even for good reasons, in shipping this kind of equipment,” says Mr Kuehr.
But it is not clear these are the “problems” to which Mr Obama refers. No American wants an electronic dumping ground in their backyard, but how to explain the EPA’s interest in far-flung shipments? While it is commendable to want to protect labourers in poor countries from toxic chemicals and nefarious brokers, these untold shipments raise the economic problem of resource depletion.
When e-waste is exported to the developing world it is estimated that only 25% of gold contained in mobile phones, for instance, is reclaimed, compared with all of it using the most advanced recycling technologies available in the rich world. Last week’s crashnotwithstanding, the steady rise in commodity prices means manufacturers have a vested interest in keeping supplies high, or even holding onto essential precious metals. Several of StEP’s manufacturer partners are known to be assessing the viability of equipment-lease and deposit schemes, in an attempt to encourage consumers to return electronics directly to them at the end of their lifecycles.
And with booms in a host of battery-powered devices on the horizon—not least electric cars, which are anticipated to place an enormous strain on resources and, ultimately, recycling facilities—both the competition for commodities and the need for better infrastructure is expected only to grow in the coming years.
Though collecting and recycling does not currently make economic sense for many materials, it is a shrewd long-term move to begin taking stock
.

Green growls in Poland


Poland's environmental politics

Green growls in Poland


Eight of Warsaw's most influential think tank experts have just published an open letter [link in Polish] arguing that ahead of Poland's EU presidency, which starts in six weeks, the government is neglecting climate-change issues. The letter matters, because its signatories directly influence planning for the six-month presidency, during which a UN climate change conference will take place in Durban. 
Entitled: "The forgotten conference", the letter urges Poland to pay more attention to the event. It bemoans the fact that Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski’s annual statement to Parliament in March 2011 did not mention the meeting and that climate-change issues are absent from Poland’s presidency priorities.
These omissions suggest that Poland is failing to take climate change seriously even as negotiations on the issue have moved far beyond the confines of environmental policy and now touch on global economic, social and political relations especially between the rich and less developed countries. The climate conference in Durban is where the negotiations will take place as to what is to happen once the Kyoto protocol runs its course requiring a new worldwide agreement on lowering CO2 emissions. In Durban, Poland will be co-responsible for coordinating a common UE position on climate.
That may be a tad optimistic: much of the foreign-policy planning now stems from Brussels, rather than from the rotating presidency.
Still, it continues:
the Polish government appears to view proposals put forward by those who want to radically limit CO2 emissions as a threat to our economy. But this approach itself marks a threat. Firstly, the EU’s Presidency role is to act as an arbiter in disputes between member states. The presidency should not take sides. Those responsible for the Polish presidency would do well to remember this. Secondly, the EU is concerned to play a leading role in the fight against climate change in Durban. Were Poland to take the role of a country which neglects the issue or indeed treats it as a threat to its well being and consequently acts as a brake on the proceedings then our position in the EU will suffer. Our presidency’s achievements in other fields will be dimmed.
The signatories are:
  • Krzysztof Bobinski – President of Union&Poland Foundation;
  • Malgorzata Bonikowska – Editor of THINKTANK Magazine; 
  • Zbigniew Czachor – Director, Centre of European Research and Education; 
  • Grzegorz Gromadzki – independent expert; 
  • Jacek Kucharczyk - President of the Executive Board, The Institute of Public Affairs; 
  • Bartek Nowak – Executive Director, Center for International Relations;
  • Jan Pieklo – Director, Polish-Ukrainian Cooperation Foundation PAUCI; and
  • Pawel Swieboda – President of demosEuropa-Centre for European Strategy