Search This Blog

Monday, October 10, 2016

Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence / The Dunning–Kruger Effect


"In many cases, incompetence does not leave people disoriented, perplexed, or cautious. Instead, the incompetent are often blessed with an inappropriate confidence, buoyed by something that feels to them like knowledge." ~ David Dunning
For more than 20 years, David Dunning researched people’s understanding of their own expertise—formally known as the study of metacognition, the processes by which human beings evaluate and regulate their knowledge, reasoning, and learning—and the results have been consistently sobering, occasionally comical, and never dull.
"The American author and aphorist William Feather once wrote that being educated means “being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don’t.” As it turns out, this simple ideal is extremely hard to achieve. Although what we know is often perceptible to us, even the broad outlines of what we don’t know are all too often completely invisible. To a great degree, we fail to recognize the frequency and scope of our ignorance." ~ David Dunning
In 1999, in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Dunning and his then graduate student Justin Kruger published a paper that documented how, in many areas of life, incompetent people do not recognize (or, more accurately, cannot recognize) just how incompetent they are, a phenomenon that became known as the Dunning-Kruger effect.
"Logic itself almost demands this lack of self-insight: For poor performers to recognize their ineptitude would require them to possess the very expertise they lack. To know how skilled or unskilled you are at using the rules of grammar, for instance, you must have a good working knowledge of those rules, an impossibility among the incompetent. Poor performers—and we are all poor performers at some things—fail to see the flaws in their thinking or the answers they lack." ~ David Dunning
To be clear, this isn’t just another armchair theory. There is a whole array of studies that were conducted by Dunning and Kruger, and what's more, others have confirmed that people who don’t know much about a given set of cognitive, technical, or social skills tend to grossly overestimate their prowess and performance.
"Because it’s so easy to judge the idiocy of others, it may be sorely tempting to think this doesn’t apply to you. But the problem of unrecognized ignorance is one that visits us all. And over the years, I’ve become convinced of one key, overarching fact about the ignorant mind. One should not think of it as uninformed. Rather, one should think of it as misinformed.
An ignorant mind is precisely not a spotless, empty vessel, but one that’s filled with the clutter of irrelevant or misleading life experiences, theories, facts, intuitions, strategies, algorithms, heuristics, metaphors, and hunches that regrettably have the look and feel of useful and accurate knowledge. This clutter is an unfortunate by-product of one of our greatest strengths as a species. We are unbridled pattern recognizers and profligate theorizers. Often, our theories are good enough to get us through the day, or at least to an age when we can procreate. But our genius for creative storytelling, combined with our inability to detect our own ignorance, can sometimes lead to situations that are embarrassing, unfortunate, or downright dangerous—especially in a technologically advanced, complex democratic society that occasionally invests mistaken popular beliefs with immense destructive power (See: crisis, financial; war, Iraq).
As the humorist Josh Billings once put it, “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.” (Ironically, one thing many people “know” about this quote is that it was first uttered by Mark Twain or Will Rogers—which just ain’t so.)" ~ David Dunning
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
http://cdp.sagepub.com/content/12/3/83.abstract
https://psmag.com/we-are-all-confident-idiots-56a60eb7febc…

 Dunning–Kruger effect

The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is. Dunning and Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive inability of those of low ability to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their ability accurately. Their research also suggests corollaries: high-ability individuals may underestimate their relative competence and may erroneously assume that tasks which are easy for them are also easy for others.

Dunning and Kruger have postulated that the effect is the result of internal illusion in those of low ability, and external misperception in those of high ability: "The miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others."


Cecile G. Tamura

Sunday, October 9, 2016

Lolita Film

ஒரு எழுத்தாளர், அவர் 14 வயசா இருக்கும் போது அவர் வயசுல இருக்கிற ஒரு பெண்ணை விரும்புறார்... அந்த பெண் அந்த சின்ன வயசுலயே இறந்து போக அவளோட பிம்பம் அப்படியே அவர் மனசில நின்னுடுது... வருடங்கள் ஓட... இப்போ அவருக்கு சுமார் 40 வயசு...

ஒரு புத்தகம் எழுதுவதற்க்காக வெளிநாடு போறார்... அங்க அவர் தங்க வேண்டிய வீட்டில ஒரு இளம் வயது விதவையும் அவரோட 14 வயது மகளும் இருக்கிறாங்க... அந்த மகளை பார்த்தவுடனே அவருக்கு தன்னோட முன்னாள் காதலி ஞாபகம் வர வீடு பிடிக்கலைன்னாலும் அங்கயே தங்குறார்... அந்த பொண்ணும் கொஞ்சம் ‘வித்தியாசமா’ பழக ஆரம்பிக்க இது என்ன மாதிரியான உறவுன்னு தெரியாம குழம்பறார்..

கதையில ட்விஸ்ட்... பொண்ணோட அம்மாவுக்கும் அவர் மேல ஒரு ‘இது’ வர சம்மதிக்கலைன்னா வீட்டை விட்டு போகணும் மகளை சந்திக்க முடியாதுன்னு அம்மாவை திருமணம் செஞ்சுக்கிறார்... பொண்ணு சம்மர் கேம்ப் போயிருக்கிற நேரத்துல இவரோட ரகசிய டைரியை அம்மா படிச்சுடுறாங்க... மானக்கேடா நாலு கேள்வி கேட்டுட்டு வீட்டை விட்டு வெளியே போறவங்க ஆக்ஸிடன்ட்ல ஸ்பாட் அவுட்..

இப்போ பொண்ணுக்கு ஒரே ஆதரவு அவர் தான்.. ஆனால் உலகத்தின் பார்வையில் பொண்ணுக்கு அப்பா...!! ஆனா ரெண்டு பேருக்கும் பல இன்ப சுற்றுலா, கேளிக்கைன்னு லவ்வு போய்ட்டிருக்கு... நடுவில ஒரு மர்மமான கேரக்டர் இவங்களை ஃபாலோ பண்ணுது திடீர்ன்னு இவரை ஏமாத்திட்டு பொண்ணு காணாம போய்டுது... இப்படி பல ட்விஸ்ட்டுகளுக்கு பின் வித்தியாசமான ஒரு முடிவுடன்... ஒரு காதலியின் நினைவுடன் வாழும் மனிதனின் கதையாக படம் போகிறது...

படம் பேர் Lolita.. படம் ரொமான்ஸ் வகையறா ஆனால் வல்கர் கிடையாது... நம்ம ஊர் கலாசார காவலர்களுக்கு தெரியாம பார்த்துடுங்க... ;)

 Lolita, arguably the most controversial film of the decade, has finally made it to theaters, and there's little doubt that all the hoopla was much ado about nothing.

Jeremy Irons stars as Humbert Humbert, while newcomer Dominique Swain takes on the part of Lolita. Melanie Griffith and Frank Langella have supporting roles as, respectively, Lolita's unhinged mother and Quilty, a mysterious figure who pops up periodically throughout the film.

By now, the storyline of Lolita is as well-known as the controversy surrounding it. Humbert Humbert, a man in his 40's, falls in love with Lolita, a 14 year old girl, and, needless to say, much trouble ensues. Along the way, Humbert ends up married to Lolita's mother, a coupling he agrees to only because he wants to keep seeing Lolita.

Lolita was originally slated for release last year, but because of a law passed a few years ago in the States regarding pedophilia, it was unable to secure an American distributor. I'm uncertain of what the situation was here in Canada, but the film finally premiered on the American pay-channel Showtime last month, and is slowly receiving a theatrical release.

Yes, the subject matter can be considered offensive. But the director, Adrian Lyne, has filmed the material in such a way that one would have to be awfully sensitive to be offended by anything in the movie. The scenes of intimacy between Humbert and Lolita are done in shadows and in a manner that generally keeps their affection private. It seems as though people were getting so upset about this film because of the premise, but I doubt those same people bothered to see the film.

The delicacy with which the subject has been handled is clearly the most surprising element within Lolita. Jeremy Irons portrays Humbert as possibly the most likable pedophile in movie history, while Dominique Swain perfectly captures the childish innocence of Lolita. In her portrayal, Lolita is a girl who is initially unaware of Humbert's wistful, and often lascivious gazes, but eventually comes to realize that she can use his lust to get what she needs. Her attempts at acting how she perceives a woman would behave are awkward and clumsy, just as one would expect from an inexperienced little girl. Their romance is actually quite charming for a time, until things start to get out of hand.

And not that a pedophile deserves any sympathy, but we're actually given a reason for Humbert's nature during a prologue right at the start of the film. When he was 14, he fell in love with a girl his age, and shared his first sexual experience with her. She died a few months later of a disease, and though it's not explicitly stated, we are meant to assume that's why Humbert developed into a pederast; to somehow reclaim the innocence and pleasure that he associated with that first real love. I've not read the original Nabokov novel, so I can't say whether or not this precursor to the story was implemented by the filmmakers as a way of making the audience feel more comfortable with Humbert. At any rate, it does explain quite a lot about him.

The only real miscalculation within the film is a scene of extreme violence in the third act that seems wholly out of place. It didn't really fit in with the rest of the movie, and I found it more offensive than the love affair between Lolita and Humbert. I've heard, though, that that same scene is just as gory in the novel, but perhaps a line needs to be drawn at what should be adapted for the screen and what shouldn't. For example, I am sure the love scenes between Lolita and Humbert were quite graphic in the book, but, obviously, the filmmakers chose to omit that from the film. So why stain the picture with a scene that would be more at home in a Paul Verhoeven flick?

Anyway, that is a very minor quibble. If you can look past all the controversy and the repugnant storyline, you'll find that Lolita is one of the best films of the year. It's beautifully shot, and all the performances hit just the right notes.
thanks: reelfilm.com

Friday, October 7, 2016

Top Ten Acupressure Points for Pain Relief & Other Problems

Acupressure therapy, sometimes called pressure acupuncture, has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for thousands of years.
It involves applying pressure to acupressure points that lie along meridians in your body to promote relaxation and treat illnesses. There are more than 400 acupressure points on the body.
It is believed that vital energy called qi (chi) flows through these meridians or energy pathways. There are 12 major meridians that connect specific organs, thus organizing a system of communication throughout the body. Illness occurs when one or more of these meridians are blocked or out of balance.








Most Western practitioners, however, attribute the benefits of acupressure to factors like reduced muscle tension, improved circulation and stimulation of brain chemicals called endorphins that act as natural pain relievers.

Irrespective of the underlying reason for its effectiveness, several studies have found this alternative therapy beneficial for relieving certain aches and pains.
The acupressure points are to be pressed with moderate pressure for a few seconds up to a couple of minutes and then released. For best results, take slow, deep breaths as you hold the acupressure points.