Search This Blog

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

ArtPrize Winners


 


Collected, here, are the top ten finalists for the grand prize:



Cavalry, American Officers, 1921 by Chris LaPorte (1st place)


Vision by David Spriggs


Dancing With Lions by Bill Secunda


Elephant Walk by Fredrick Prescott


Helping Mom one penny at a time by Wander Martich


Lure/Wave, Grand Rapids (Lure/Forest) by Beili Liu


salt & earth (garden for Patricia) by Young Kim


Svelata by Mia Tavonatti


SteamPig by Jensen Birks

ArtPrize 2010 just selected winners! The first place winner received $250,000 and a total purse worth $449,000 was handed out to the top ten artists.The winner was announced along with the 9 other runners-up that received awards.
The competition has become an annual event in Grand Rapids, Michigan and attracts artists from all over the world. The public voted competition (by texting or web site voting) is open to anyone and any type of medium. Artists are allowed to submit one piece into the competition which, among being eligible for the $449,000 purse, are subject to a jury for best two-dimensional work (2D), best three-dimensional work (3D), best time-based work (Performance/Film/Video), best use of urban space and international award.

SunRed Solar Moped





USBPen drives go Crazy.........








































Creativity and human reasoning during decision-making




Modern human brainModern human brain. Image source: Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison Brain Collection.
A hallmark of human intelligence is the ability to efficiently adapt to uncertain, changing and open-ended environments. In such environments, efficient adaptive behavior often requires considering multiple alternative behavioral strategies, adjusting them, and possibly inventing new ones. These reasoning, learning and creative abilities involve the frontal lobes, which are especially well developed in humans compared to other primates. However, how the frontal function decides to create new strategies and how multiple strategies can be monitored concurrently remain largely unknown.
In a new study, published March 27 in the online, open-access journal PLoS Biology, Anne Collins and Etienne Koechlin of Ecole Normale Supérieure and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, France, examine frontal lobe function using behavioral experiments and computational models of human decision-making. They find that human frontal function concurrently monitors no more than three/four strategies but favors creativity, i.e. the exploration and creation of new strategies whenever no monitored strategies appear to be reliable enough.
The researchers asked one hundred participants to find "3-digit pin codes" by a method of trial and error, under a variety of conditions. They then developed a computational model that predicted the responses produced by participants, which also revealed that participants made their choices by mentally constructing and concurrently monitoring up to three distinct behavioral strategies; flexibly associating digits, motor responses and expected auditory feedbacks.
"This is a remarkable result, because the actual number of correct codes varied across sessions. This suggests that this capacity limit is a hard constraint of human higher cognition," said Dr. Koechlin. Consistently, the performance was significantly better in sessions including no more than three repeated codes.
Furthermore, the researchers found that the pattern of participants' responses derived from a decision system that strongly favors the exploration of new behavioral strategies: "The results provide evidence that the human executive system favors creativity for compensating its limited monitoring capacity" explained Dr. Koechlin. "It favors the exploration of new strategies but restrains the monitoring and storage of uncompetitive ones. Interestingly, this ability to regulate creativity varied across participants and critically explains individual variations in performances. We believe our study may also help to understand the biological foundations of individual differences in decision-making and adaptive behavior".
More information: Collins A, Koechlin E (2012) Reasoning, Learning, and Creativity: Frontal Lobe Function and Human Decision-Making. PLoS Biol10(3): e1001293.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001293
Provided by Public Library of Science
"Creativity and human reasoning during decision-making." March 27th, 2012. http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-03-creativity-human-decision-making.html
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek

!! Health Benefits of Pomegranate Juice !!



HOW THIS COMPANY CREATED A BILLION DOLLAR BUSINESS STRATEGY




Lululemon, one of today’s most popular workout apparel chains has made a killing in the business world. Want to know what makes their business so successful? Get their model here!
TheWeek.com shares…
Investors expected little from Lululemon when it began selling shares at $2 a pop in 2007. The maker of Wunder Under pants and other yoga women’s wear hardly seemed like a player in the competitive world of retail sportswear. Five years later, Lululemon’s stock has hit $76, and the company is valued at $10 billion — more than the clothing behemoth J.C. Penney. Last week, Lululemon posted a quarterly profit of $74 million, reported sales growth for the twelfth straight quarter, and, fittingly, opened a Boston store with a yoga class and dance party for 500 neon-clad guests. Here, a guide to Lululemon’s “secret sauce”:
How is Lululemon different from other retailers? 
One key to its success is a “scarcity” model, in which its outlets keep only a limited supply of stock. Customers know that they have to buy an item right away if they want to get their hands on it, which “creates these fanatical shoppers,” CEO Christine Day tells The Wall Street Journal. Lululemon also rarely offers sales, which means its customers buy everything at full price. Its yoga pants, for example, range from $75 to $128, while similar products can be found at the Gap at prices as low as $25.
Why do customers pony up for the more expensive stuff? 
Call it the Apple model. Day’s strategy is to continually refine Lululemon’s core products, which results in clothes that are “aesthetically pleasing, functional — and pricier,” says Marina Strauss at Canada’s The Globe and Mail. Day has pledged to keep improving the features and fabrics of Lululemon’s clothes, even though that will bump up costs. The investment pays off by inspiring “fierce loyalty, with bloggers breathlessly documenting every product launch,” says Allison Martell at Reuters.
Get the entire article at TheWeek.com!