Search This Blog

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

How Does Its Cooling?: A Theoritical View on Air Conditioner & Refrigerator.



1. How Does an Air Conditioner Work?

     Air conditioners and refrigerators work the same way. Instead of cooling just the small, insulated space inside of a refrigerator, an air conditioner cools a room, a whole house, or an entire business.
     Air conditioners use chemicals that easily convert from a gas to a liquid and back again. This chemical is used to transfer heat from the air inside of a home to the outside air.
     The machine has three main parts. They are a compressor, a condenser and an evaporator. The compressor and condenser are usually located on the outside air portion of the air conditioner. The evaporator is located on the inside the house, sometimes as part of a furnace. That's the part that heats your house.
     The working fluid arrives at the compressor as a cool, low-pressure gas. The compressor squeezes the fluid. This packs the molecule of the fluid closer together. The closer the molecules are together, the higher its energy and its temperature.
     The working fluid leaves the compressor as a hot, high pressure gas and flows into the condenser. If you looked at the air conditioner part outside a house, look for the part that has metal fins all around. The fins act just like a radiator in a car and helps the heat go away, or dissipate, more quickly.
     When the working fluid leaves the condenser, its temperature is much cooler and it has changed from a gas to a liquid under high pressure. The liquid goes into the evaporator through a very tiny, narrow hole. On the other side, the liquid's pressure drops. When it does it begins to evaporate into a gas. 
     As the liquid changes to gas and evaporates, it extracts heat from the air around it. The heat in the air is needed to separate the molecules of the fluid from a liquid to a gas. 
     The evaporator also has metal fins to help in exchange the thermal energy with the surrounding air. 
     By the time the working fluid leaves the evaporator, it is a cool, low pressure gas. It then returns to the compressor to begin its trip all over again. 
     Connected to the evaporator is a fan that circulates the air inside the house to blow across the evaporator fins. Hot air is lighter than cold air, so the hot air in the room rises to the top of a room.
     There is a vent there where air is sucked into the air conditioner and goes down ducts. The hot air is used to cool the gas in the evaporator. As the heat is removed from the air, the air is cooled. It is then blown into the house through other ducts usually at the floor level.
     This continues over and over and over until the room reaches the temperature you want the room cooled to. The thermostat senses that the temperature has reached the right setting and turns off the air conditioner. As the room warms up, the thermostat turns the air conditioner back on until the room reaches the temperature.

2. How Does A Refrigerator Work?
     In the summertime, have you ever gotten out of a swimming pool and then felt very cold standing in the sun? That's because the water on your skin is evaporating. The air carries off the water vapor, and with it some of the heat is being taken away from your skin.
      This is similar to what happens inside older refrigerators. Instead of water, though, the refrigerator uses chemicals to do the cooling.
      There are two things that need to be known for refrigeration.
  1. A gas cools on expansion.
  2. When you have two things that are different temperatures that touch or are near each other, the hotter surface cools and the colder surface warms up. This is a law of physics called the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

Old Refrigerators & Today's Refrigerators:-

     If you look at the back or bottom of an older refrigerator, you'll see a long thin tube that loops back and forth. This tube is connected to a pump, which is powered by an electric motor. 
Inside the tube is Freon, a type of gas. Freon is the brand name of the gas. This gas, chemically is called Chloro-Flouro-Carbon or CFC. This gas was found to hurt the environment if it leaks from refrigerators. So now, other chemicals are used in a slightly different process (see next section below).
      CFC starts out as a liquid. The pump pushes the CFC through a lot of coils in the freezer area. There the chemical turns to a vapor. When it does, it soaks up some of the heat that may be in the freezer compartment. As it does this, the coils get colder and the freezer begins to get colder.
      In the regular part of your refrigerator, there are fewer coils and a larger space. So, less heat is soaked up by the coils and the CFC vapor.
     The pump then sucks the CFC as a vapor and forces it through thinner pipes which are on the outside of the refrigerator. By compressing it, the CFC turns back into a liquid and heat is given off and is absorbed by the air around it. That's why it might be a little warmer behind or under your refrigerator.
      Once the CFC passes through the outside coils, the liquid is ready to go back through the freezer and refrigerator over and over.
Modern refrigerators don't use CFC because CFCs are harmful to the atmosphere if released. Instead they use another type of gas called HFC-134a, also called tetrafluoroethane. HFC turns into a liquid when it is cooled to -15.9 degrees Fahrenheit (-26.6 degrees Celsius).
      A motor and compressor squeezes the HFC.  When it is compressed, a gas heats up as it is pressurized. When you pass the compressed gas through the coils on the back or bottom of a modern refrigerator, the warmer gas can lose its heat to the air in the room.
      Remember the law of thermodynamics.
As it cools, the HFC can change into a liquid because it is under a high pressure.
The liquid flows through what's called an expansion valve, a tiny small hole that the liquid has to squeeze through. Between the valve and the compressor, there is a low-pressure area because the compressor is pulling the ammonia gas out of that side.
      When the liquid HFC hits a low pressure area it boils and changes into a gas. This is called vaporizing.
      The coils then go through the freezer and regular part of the refrigerator where the colder liquid in the coil pulls the heat out of the compartments. This makes the inside of the freezer and entire refrigerator cold.
      The compressor sucks up the cold gas, and the gas goes back through the same process over and over.

+Famous Books and Writers+


Book's Name                                      Author's Name
A Gift of Monotheists                                                         Ram Mohan Roy
A Minister and his ResponsibilitiesMorarji Bhai Desai
A Nation is MakingSurendra Nath Bandhopadhye
A Pair of Blue EyesThomash Hardy
A Passage to IndiaE. M. Foster
A Revenue Stamp (autobiography)Amrita Pritam
A Strange and Sublime AddressAmit Choudhary
A Suitable BoyBikram Seth
A Tale of Two CitiesCharls Dikens
A Voice of FreedomNayantara Shehgal
A week with GandhiL. Fischer
Adventures of Sherlock HomesArther Canon Doel
All the Prime Minister's MenJanardan Thakur
Allahabad PrasastiHarisen
Amitabh- the Making of the SuperstarSusmita Das Gupta
Amukta MalyadKrishna Deva Raya
An Unknown IndianNirod C. Choudhary
Anand MathBankim Chandra Chattopadhaye
Anna KareninaLeo Tolstoy
AparajitoBibhuti Bhushan Bandopadhyay
Apple CartG. B. Shaw
AranyakBibhuti Bhushan Bandopadhyay
ArogyaniketanTarashankar Bandopadhyay
AstyadhayePanini
Bakul KathaAshapurna Devi
Ban Palashir PadabaliRamapada Chowdhury
Bandit QueenMala Sen
Banpalashir PadabaliRamapada Chowdhuri
Bela Obela KalbelaJibanananda Das
Bengali ZamindarNilmoni Mukherjee
BicramanchadevBilhon
Blind BeautyBoris Pasternak
BuddhacharitAsha Ghosh
Captive LadyMichel Madhusudan Dutta
Causes of the Indian MutinySir Syyed Ahmed Khan
CharitraheenSarat Chandra Chattopadhyay
ChidambaraS. N. Panth
Circle of the RegionAmitabha Ghosh
City of Job CharnakNisith Ranjan Roy
Commedy ErrorsShekhspear
Conversations with MyselfNelson Mandela
CoolieMulkraj Anand
Crisis of IndiaRonal Segal
Das CapitalKarl Marks
Death of PresidentW. Marchent
DecamarenBocachio
Desert VillageOliver Goldsmith
DevdasSarat Chandra Chattopadhyay
Development as FreedomAmartya Sen
Devi ChaudharaniBankim Chandra Chattopadhaye
Devine ComediDante
Divine LifeSivanand
Economic History of IndiaRamesh Chandra Dutta
End and Means                  Huxlay
Faust          Goethe
Ferary Queen                                                             Edmond Spensar
Freedom at MidnightLapierre & Collins
Friend Not MasterAyub Khan
GanadebataTarashankar Bandopadhyay
Gathering StromChurchil
Ghulam GiriJyotiba Phule
Global Crisis Recession and Uneven RecoveryY.B. Reddy
Great Indian and Their Landmark SpeechesManohar and Sarita Prabhakar
GuidR. K. Narayanan
GurdbahoBakpatiraj
Hero of NymphAurobindo Ghosh
Hind SwarajM. K. Gandhi
Hindu View of LifeS. Radhakrishnan
HistoricaHerodotus
I follow the MahatmaK. M. Munshi
I Van HoWalter Scot
Ignited Minds - Unleashing the power within IndiaDR. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam
In an Antique LandAmitabh Ghosh
India 2020 - A Vision for the New MillenniumDR. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam
India DividedRajendra Prashad
India Wins FreedomAbdul Kalam Azad
Indian EpigraphyD. C. Sircar
Indian VillageS.C. Dube
Indian war and IndependenceD. V. Savarkar
IndicaMegasthenis
Infinite JestDavid Foster Wallace
Inheritance of LossKiran Desai
JalsagharTarashankar Bandopadhyay
Jhara PalakJibanananda Das
Jinnah- India, Partition, IndependenceJaswant Singh
Jungle BookR. Kippling
Kanterbary TellsGeofray Chosar
KidnappedStevenson
Kubla KhanColeridge
Lalit BiharAshwa Ghosh
Life DevineAurobindo Ghosh
MahabhashyaPatanjali
Man and SupermanG. B. Shaw
Midnight ChildrenSalman Rushdi
MitaksharaVijnaneswara
Modernization of Indian TraditionYogendra Singh
MotherMaxim Gorkay
Mother IndiaKatharin Mayo
Murder in CathedralElliot
My Country My LifeLal Krishna Advani
My Experiments With TruthM.K. Gandhi
My Indian YearsLord Hardinge II
My JourneyDR. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam
Myth of IndependenceZulfikar Ali Bhutto
Neel DarpanDinbandhu Mitra
Netaji Dead or AliveSamar Guha
New Dimensions of India's Foreign PolicyA. B. Vajpayee
New IndiaAnnie Besant
One Night @ the Call CentreChetan Bhagat
Padma Nadir MajhiManik Bandopadhyay
Pakhtoon                                                        Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan
Palli SamajSarat Chandra Chattopadhyay
Paradise LostJohn Milton
ParineetaSarat Chandra Chattopadhyay
Pather PanchaliBibhuti BHushan Bandopadhaye
Poverty & Un-British Rule in IndiaDadabhai Naoroji
Pratham PratisrutiAshapurna Devi
Precepts of JesusRam Mohan Roy
Principles of SociologyHerbert Spencer
Prison DiaryJay Prakash Narayan
Problems of the EastLord Curzon
Putul Nacher ItikathaManik Bandopadhyay
Races and Cultures of IndiaD.N. Majumdar
RajtaranginiKalhan
RamcharitS. K. Nandi
RashmirathiRamdhari Singh Dinkar
River of SmokeAmitav Ghosh
SaketMathili Saran Gupta
Satyarth PrakashSwami Dayanand
Shadow LineAmitabh Ghosh
Shadow of LadakhB. Bhattacharia
Shape of Things To ComeH. G. Wells
SitaramBankim Chandra Chattopadhaye
Social Structure of ValuesRadha Kamal Mukherjee
Straight from the HeartKapil Dev
SubarnalataAshapurna Devi
Tahakak - E - HIndAlbiruni
TalismanWalter Scott
The Algebra of Infinite JusticeArundhati Roy
The Bandit QueenMala Sen
The City of JoyDhominic Lapier
The Discovery of IndiaJawahar Lal Nehru
The God of Small ThingsArundhuti Roy
The Harry Potter SeriesJ. K. Rowling
The Indian StruggleSubash Chandra Bose
The Indian War of IndependenceV. D. Savarkar
The JudgementKuldip Nayar
The Masque of AfricaV. S. Naipaul
The Miracle of Democracy: India's Amazing JourneyMr. T. S. Krishnamurthy
The Nadars of Tamil NaduD.N. Dhanagre
The Nehrus; Motilal and JawaharlalB. R. Nanda
The PrinceMaciavaly
The Satanic VerseSalman Rushdi
The Science of Bharat NatyamSaroja Vaidyanathan
The Silent CryKenjaburo Ue
The Spirit of IslamSyyed Amir Ali
The White TigerAravind Adiga
Theory of RelativityAlexander Doma
Three MarketiarsEinstein
To all fighters of freedom, Why Socialism?J. P. Narayan
Truth, Love and A Little MaliceKhushwant Singh
Two Leaves and a BudMulkraj Anand
Two LivesVikram Seth
Unhappy IndiaL. Roy
UrbashiR. D. Dinkar
Utopia                                                                    Thomas Moor
Vision of the PastMichel Madhusudan Dutta
Volga Se GangaRahul Sankritayan
War and PeaceTolstoy
What Congress and Gandhi have done to the untouchablesB. R. Ambedkar
Wings of FireDR. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam

தியானத்தில் மனம் குவிய மறுப்பது ஏன்?


 தியானம் செய்யும் போதும்பூஜை செய்யும் போதும் மனம் குவியதில் சிரமம்ஏற்படுவது ஏன்இது நம்மில் பலருக்கு தினசரி ஏற்படும் கேள்வியாகும் மாலை பொழுது கதிரவன் மேற்கிலிருந்து மஞ்சள் ஒளியால் கடற்கரை மணற்பரப்பை குளிப்பாட்டி கொண்டிருக்கிறான்.  சந்தன மரத்தில் கடைந்தெடுத்த பதுமை போல் அழகான மாதொருத்தி கடற்காற்றில் கூந்தலும் ஆடையும் வர்ணஜாலம் புரிய நடந்து வருகிறாள்.  கருங்கூந்தல்கற்றைகள் காற்றில் பிரிந்து அவள் மாம்பழ கன்னத்தில் விதவிதமான கோட்டோவியங்களை வரைகின்றது.  

விழிகளை மூடாமல் அவள் அழகை விழுங்கி விடுவது போல் பார்க்கிறீர்கள் அந்த ரசனையின் இன்ப வேதனை பக்கத்தில் அமர்ந்து இருக்கும் நண்பனை கூட மறக்க செய்கிறது.  உங்கள் வயதுதகுதி தாரதரம் எல்லாம் மறந்து போய் விடுகிறது. காற்று அள்ளி வரும் கடற்கரை மணல் கண்களில் வீழ்ந்தால் கூட அது உருத்துவது இல்லை.  வியாபாரத்தில் பல லட்ச ரூபாய் லாபம் கிடைக்கிறது.  கிடைத்த பணத்தை வங்கியில் போட ஒவ்வொரு நோட்டுகளாக எண்ணுகிறோம்.  அருகில் மனைவி வருகிறாள் கவனிக்க வில்லை.அப்பா கூப்பிடுகிறார் காதில்விழவில்லை.  குழந்தை மிட்டாய் கேட்டு அழுகிறது.  அதுவும் நமது கவனத்தைகவரவில்லை.   மனம் முழுக்க முழுக்க பணத்தை எண்ணுவதை தவிர வேறு எதிலும் நாட்டம் கொள்ளவில்லை. பெண்ணின் அழகை ரசிப்பதிலும் பணத்தை ருசி பார்ப்பதிலும் சிந்தாமல் சிதறாமல் ஒருமைப்பாட்டுடன் இருக்கும் மனம் தியானம் என்று உடகார்ந்த உடன் ஆற்றில் நீச்சல் அடிப்பதையும்கடன்காரன் வருவதையும் நினைத்து நாலாபுறமும் சிதறி ஓடுகிறது.  இதிலிருந்து என்ன தெரிகிறது?  
நமக்கு எதில் ஆர்வமோ எதில் ஆசையோ அதில் மனது குவிகிறது. மற்றவற்றில் குவிய மறுக்கிறது.  சண்டித்தனம் பண்ணுகிறது. தியானத்தை பற்றி நிறைய பேசுகிறோம்.  ஆனால் நமது மனம் அதை முக்கயமானதாக நம்புவது இல்லை.  அதனால் அசட்டை ஏற்படுகிறது. இந்த அசட்டை தான் நமது முன்னேற்றத்திற்கு பெரிய தடையாக இருக்கிறது.   

இருபத்தி நான்கு மணி நேரத்தில் பத்து நிமிடத்தை முழுமையாக தியானத்திற்கு ஒதுக்க நம்மால் முடியவில்லை.  எனவே தியானம் செய்வதற்கு மிக முக்கியமான தேவை மன ஒருமைப்பாடு அல்ல ஆர்வம் மட்டுமே ஆகும்முதலில் தியானம் செய்ய பூஜைசெய்ய ஆர்வத்தை வளர்த்துக் கொள்ளுங்கள். மனம் தானாக குவியும். முயன்றால் முடியாதது ஏதும் உண்டோ நம்மால்? முயற்சி செய்வோம் நாமே!!!  
மேலும் பயணிப்போம் நண்பர்களே...அன்புடன் கே எம் தர்மா...

Deep Brain Stimulation Studies Show How Brain Buys Time for Tough Choices



Science Daily  — Take your time. Hold your horses. Sleep on it. When people must decide between arguably equal choices, they need time to deliberate. In the case of people undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease, that process sometimes doesn't kick in, leading to impulsive behavior. Some people who receive deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease behave impulsively, making quick, often bad, decisions.

New research into why that happens has led scientists to explain how the brain devotes time to reflect on tough choices.
Michael Frank, professor of cognitive, linguistic, and psychological sciences at Brown University, studied the impulsive behavior of Parkinson's patients when he was at the University of Arizona several years ago. His goal was to model the brain's decision-making mechanics. He had begun working with Parkinson's patients because DBS, a treatment that suppresses their tremor symptoms, delivers pulses of electrical current to the subthalamic nucleus (STN), a part of the brain that Frank hypothesized had an important role in decisions. Could the STN be what slams the brakes on impulses, giving the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) time to think?
When the medial prefrontal cortex needs time to deliberate, it recruits help ward off impulsive urges from elsewhere in the brain."We didn't have any direct evidence of that," said Frank, affiliated with the Brown Institute for Brain Science. "To test that theory for how areas of the brain interact to prevent you from making impulsive decisions and how that could be changed by DBS, you have to do experiments where you record brain activity in both parts of the network that we think are involved. Then you also have to manipulate the system to see how the relationship between recorded activity in one area and decision making changes as a function of stimulating the other area."
Frank and his team at Brown and Arizona did exactly that. They describe their findings in a study published online in the journal Nature Neuroscience.
The researchers' measurements from two experiments and analysis with a computer model support the theory that when the mPFC is faced with a tough decision, it recruits the STN to ward off more impulsive urges coming from the striatum, a third part of the brain. That allows it time to make its decision.
For their first experiment, the researchers designed a computerized decision-making experiment. They asked 65 healthy subjects and 14 subjects with Parkinson's disease to choose between pairs of generic line art images while their mPFC brain activity was recorded. Each image was each associated with a level of reward. Over time the subjects learned which ones carried a greater reward.
Sometimes, however, the subjects would be confronted with images of almost equal reward -- a relatively tough choice. That's when scalp electrodes detected elevated activity in the mPFC in certain low frequency bands. Lead author and postdoctoral scholar James Cavanagh found that when mPFC activity was larger, healthy participants and Parkinson's participants whose stimulators were off would take proportionally longer to decide. But when deep brain stimulators were turned on to alter STN function, the relationship between mPFC activity and decision making was reversed, leading to decision making that was quicker and less accurate.
The Parkinson's patients whose stimulators were on still showed the same elevated level of activity in the mPFC. The cortex wanted to deliberate, Cavanagh said, but the link to the brakes had been cut.
"Parkinson's patients on DBS had the same signals," he said. "It just didn't relate to behavior. We had knocked out the network."
In the second experiment, the researchers presented eight patients with the same decision-making game while they were on the operating table in Arizona receiving their DBS implant. The researchers used the electrode to record activity directly in the STN and found a pattern of brain activity closely associated with the patterns they observed in the mPFC.
"The STN has greater activity with greater [decision] conflict," he said. "It is responsive to the circumstances that the signals on top of the scalp are responsive to, and in highly similar frequency bands and time ranges."
A mathematical model for analyzing the measurements of accuracy and response time confirmed that the elevated neural activity and the extra time people took to decide was indeed evidence of effortful deliberation.
"It was not that they were waiting without doing anything," said graduate student Thomas Wiecki, the paper's second author. "They were slower because they were taking the time to make a more informed decision. They were processing it more thoroughly."
The results have led the researchers to think that perhaps the different brain regions communicate by virtue of these low-frequency signals. Maybe the impulsivity side effect of DBS could be mitigated if those bands could remain unhindered by the stimulator's signal. Alternatively, Wiecki said, a more sophisticated DBS system could sense that decision conflict is underway in the mPFC and either temporarily suspend its operation until the decision is made, or stimulate the STN in a more dynamic way to better mimic intact STN function.
These are not trivial ideas to foist upon DBS engineers, but by understanding the mechanics underlying the side effect -- and in healthy unhindered decision making -- the researchers say they now have a target to consider.
In addition to Frank, Cavanagh, and Wiecki, another Brown author is Christina Figueroa. Arizona authors include Michael Cohen, Johan Samanta, and Scott Sherman.
The Michael J. Fox Foundation funded the research.

Handling Nanoscale Particles: 'Next-Generation' Optical Tweezers Trap Tightly Without Overheating


This is the optical table in Ken Crozier's lab at Harvard SEAS. (Credit: Eliza Grinnell / Harvard SEAS)

Science Daily  — Engineers at Harvard have created a device that may make it easier to isolate and study tiny particles such as viruses.










"We can get beyond the limitations of conventional optical tweezers, exerting a larger force on a nanoparticle for the same laser power," says principal investigator Ken Crozier, Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS).
Their plasmonic nanotweezers, revealed this month in Nature Communications, use light from a laser to trap nanoscale particles. The new device creates strong forces more efficiently than traditional optical tweezers and eliminates a problem that caused earlier setups to overheat.
"Until now, overheating has been a major problem with tweezers based on surface plasmons. What we've shown is that you can get beyond that limitation by building a plasmonic nanotweezer with an integrated heat sink."
Optical tweezers have been an essential tool in biophysics for several decades, often used for studying cellular components such as molecular motors. Researchers can trap and manipulate the proteins that whip a flagellum, for example, and measure the force of its swimming motion.
But optical tweezers have drawbacks and limits, so researchers like Crozier are perfecting what might be called the "next-generation" model: plasmonic nanotweezers.
To create conventional optical tweezers, which were invented at Bell Labs in the 1980s, scientists shine a laser through a microscope lens, which focuses it into a very tight spot. The light, which is made up of electromagnetic waves, creates a gradient force at that focused spot that can attract a tiny particle and hold it within the beam for a short period of time -- until random motion, radiation pressure, or other forces knock it out.
The trouble with these optical tweezers is that a lens cannot focus the beam any smaller than half the wavelength of the light. If the targeted particle is much smaller than the focal spot, the trapping will be imprecise.
At the same time, the focal size limit places an upper limit on the gradient force that can be generated. A stronger force is necessary for trapping nanoscale particles, relative to larger, microscopic particles, so conventional optical tweezers must use a very high-powered laser to trap the tiniest targets.
To overcome these problems, researchers in applied physics discovered a few years ago that they could enhance the trapping field by focusing the laser onto an array of nanoscale gold disks. The light excites the electrons at the surface of the metal, creating rapid waves of electromagnetic charge called plasma oscillations, resulting in "hot spots" of enhanced fields around the edges of the disk.
In other researchers' designs, the tiny gold disks were arrayed on a sheet of glass, and the whole setup was submerged in water with the target particles. In tests with those devices, one problem was that the brightest hotspots were at the base of the pillars, partially inside the glass, where the particles could never be trapped. A bigger problem, as Crozier's team discovered, was that unless they kept the laser power very low, the water boiled.
The Harvard team has solved both problems by replacing the glass with a piece of silicon coated in copper and then gold, with raised gold pillars. These materials are much more thermally conductive than glass, so they act as a heat sink.
"The gold, copper, and silicon under the pillars act just like the heat sink attached to the chip in your PC, drawing the heat away," says lead author Kai Wang (Ph.D. '11), who completed the work at SEAS and is now a postdoctoral fellow at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
The new device reduces the water heating by about 100-fold and produces hotspots at the top edges of the pillars, where Crozier's team was able to trap polystyrene balls as small as 110 nanometers.
In an unusual twist, the team discovered that they were able to rotate the trapped particles around the pillars by rotating the linear polarizer on the optical table where they conducted the experiments. Going further, they replaced the linear polarizer with a circular one and found that the particle automatically and continuously traveled around the pillar.
As the electromagnetic field circled the pillar, it created an optical force that pushed the particle. Interestingly, despite the fact that the electromagnetic field traveled at about 1014 rotations per second, the balance between the optical force and the fluid drag resulted in a particle velocity of about 5 rotations per second, effectively a terminal velocity.
"This phenomenon seems to be entirely novel," says Crozier. "People have trapped particles before, but they've never done anything like that."
As tools for trapping and manipulating nanoparticles become more advanced, the potential applications in biophysics are extensive. One remaining challenge, however, is the researchers' ability to detect and quantify the motion of such tiny particles.
"It's going to be harder and harder to precisely track the center of the particle when we do these manipulations," says Crozier. "Progress in the realm of sensing tools will need to keep up."
Crozier and Wang's co-authors were Ethan Schonbrun, a former research associate, and Paul Steinvurzel, a former postdoctoral researcher, both from Crozier's lab at SEAS. The work was supported by the National Science Foundation, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the U.S. Department of Energy.

People Learn While They Sleep, Study Suggests


People may be learning while they're sleeping -- an unconscious form of memory that is still not well understood. (Credit: © Valua Vitaly / Fotolia)

Science Daily  — People may be learning while they're sleeping -- an unconscious form of memory that is still not well understood, according to a study by Michigan State University researchers.












"We speculate that we may be investigating a separate form of memory, distinct from traditional memory systems," said Kimberly Fenn, assistant professor of psychology and lead researcher on the project. "There is substantial evidence that during sleep, your brain is processing information without your awareness and this ability may contribute to memory in a waking state."The findings are highlighted in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
In the study of more than 250 people, Fenn and Zach Hambrick, associate professor of psychology, suggest people derive vastly different effects from this "sleep memory" ability, with some memories improving dramatically and others not at all. This ability is a new, previously undefined form of memory.
"You and I could go to bed at the same time and get the same amount of sleep," Fenn said, "but while your memory may increase substantially, there may be no change in mine." She added that most people showed improvement.
Fenn said she believes this potential separate memory ability is not being captured by traditional intelligence tests and aptitude tests such as the SAT and ACT.
"This is the first step to investigate whether or not this potential new memory construct is related to outcomes such as classroom learning," she said.
It also reinforces the need for a good night's sleep. According to the National Sleep Foundation, people are sleeping less every year, with 63 percent of Americans saying their sleep needs are not being met during the week.
"Simply improving your sleep could potentially improve your performance in the classroom," Fenn said.

Changing Race by Changing Clothes? Stereotypes and Status Symbols Impact If a Face Is Viewed as Black or White


A sample of the kinds of faces shown to participants in the study, which "shows how the perception of a face is always a compromise between the visual cues before our eyes and the baggage we bring to the table, like the stereotypes we hold," says Jonathan B. Freeman. (Credit: Image courtesy of Tufts University)

Science Daily  — An interdisciplinary team of researchers from Tufts University, Stanford University and the University of California, Irvine has found that the perception of race can be altered by cues to social status as simple as the clothes a person wears.
















"Looking the part: Social status cues shape race perception" appears inPLoS ONE published online September 26.Far from being a straightforward "read out" of facial features, say the researchers, racial categorization represents a complex and subtle process powerfully shaped by context and the stereotypes and prejudices we already hold.In the experiments, study participants were asked to determine the race of computerized faces. Faces accompanied by business attire were more likely to be seen as White, whereas faces accompanied by janitor attire were more likely to be seen as Black.
A novel hand-tracking technique -- which recorded participants' hand trajectories while using a mouse to select a racial category on the computer screen -- also revealed far more subtle influences of the stereotypical status cues.
Even when participants ultimately decided that a face with low-status attire was White or a face with high-status attire was Black, they showed that they were still drawn to the other race that was stereotypically tied to the status cue by moving the mouse slightly closer to that response before making their final decision.
The researchers then ran a series of computer simulations to show how the shifting of race perception by status cues naturally emerges in a system that is mathematically similar to a human brain -- so long as that system already associates Whites with high status and Blacks with low status.
"The study shows how the perception of a face is always a compromise between the visual cues before our eyes and the baggage we bring to the table, like the stereotypes we hold," says the study's lead author, Jonathan B. Freeman, a doctoral candidate in psychology at the Tufts Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.
The results highlight one of the possible mechanisms through which subtle and unconscious racism continues to occur.
"Racial stereotypes are powerful enough to trickle down to affect even basic visual processing of other people, systematically skewing the way we view our social world," Freeman says.
Status cues had the largest effects for the faces that were most racially ambiguous, a notable finding given recent and projected growth of the multiracial population in the United States.
The National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation provided funding for this work.