Search This Blog

Friday, February 17, 2012

The Sweetest Animal Kissing!!!


















Awesome Micro Photography of Water Drops










Creative Eye Makeup Photos











Bonsai Sculptures









Amazing Beauty Of Nature !












Inactive genes surprisingly common in humans



Study proves nobody is genetically perfect(Medical Xpress) -- Every person carries on average 100 variants that disable genes - yet very few suffer ill effects, an international team of researchers led by Yale University and Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute report in the Feb. 17 issue of the journal Science.
Scientists were surprised to find so many of these variants in healthy individuals because loss of gene functions leads to diseases such as cystic fibrosis and muscular dystrophy. The findings will allow researchers to better pinpoint new disease-causing mutations by helping them differentiate between frequently occurring but harmless genetic variants and rare dangerous ones, the authors say.
The study is the latest coming from the 1000 Genomes Project, a massive international personal genomics effort aiming to provide a comprehensive resource of human genetic variation that will help speed the development of personalized therapies based on the genetic makeup of patients.
The team analyzed the genomes of 185 individuals from Europe, Asia, and Africa looking for so-called loss-of-function variants, mutations that disable a gene’s ability to make protein.
“Even though previous studies have shown that loss-of-function variants exist in the general population, their extent has been underappreciated. This is the first time we have a definite sense of variation in the numbers of functional genes between individuals,” said Suganthi Balasubramanian, the lead Yale author in the paper.
The study shows no individual has a full complement of functional genes.  On average, each individual has 20 genes where both copies of the gene are disabled.
“In total, this study identified 253 such genes. This means at least one percent of human genes can be shut down without causing serious disease,” explains Mark Gerstein, Albert L. Williams Professor of Biomedical Informatics, co-senior author from Yale University.
The catalog of loss-of-function variants in healthy genomes will be invaluable to clinicians as they begin to use personalized genomic analysis to help diagnose and treat disease, the authors say.
 “Our research will be beneficial for current DNA sequencing studies underway in disease patients,” says Dr Chris Tyler-Smith, co-senior author from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. “The common loss-of-function variants were typically in genes that can be shut down without causing serious effects.”
Scientists also found a large number of extremely rare variants and “we believe these will be the most interesting cases in terms of a potential role in human disease,” says  Dr Daniel MacArthur from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, lead author on the study.
The study also showed that as many as a quarter of the loss-of-function variants involve large stretches of DNA (so-called structural variants), rather than mutations of single base pairs, which were believed to be the primary source of genetic variation. Structural variants are not yet well characterized in the human population and represent a major Yale contribution to 1000 Genomes Project. The Yale team is also looking at variants outside of regions of DNA that code for genes, an area that constitutes the vast majority of the genome.
More information: "A Systematic Survey of Loss-of-Function Variants in Human Protein-Coding Genes," by D.G. MacArthur, Science, 2012.
Provided by Yale University
"Inactive genes surprisingly common in humans." February 16th, 2012. http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-02-inactive-genes-surprisingly-common-humans.html
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek

Aging studies suggest older people are happier




Aging studies suggest older people are happierLab manager Julia Harris (right) places glasses with a mobile tracking device on Derek Isaacowitz, associate professor of psychology, in the Lifespan Emotional Development Lab (LEDlab). Credit: Mary Knox Merrill.
(Medical Xpress) -- We get wrinkles. Our hair turns gray, or we lose it altogether. Our job prospects diminish and our chances of incurring disease increase. Researchers across the globe focus their efforts on increasing our life span because so many of us believe getting old stinks.
But that may not be so, according to Derek Isaacowitz a newly appointed associate professor of psychology in the College of Science. Contrary to popular opinion, he says, older people are happier than their younger counterparts.
“Self-report studies of happiness typically find that older people are happier,” Isaacowitz explains. But for the psychologist, who joined the Northeastern faculty after spending a decade at Brandeis, self-reporting is not enough. He wants to know why older people are happier.
To tackle this question, he employs a state-of-the-art testing method not typically used in aging research: eye tracking.
Eye tracking, he says, follows a participant’s eye movements by taking 60 snapshots of his or her pupils each second. Isaacowitz couples self-reports of mood with eye tracking data to pinpoint exactly what a person is looking at while rating his or her mood.
“We can analyze data in a moment to say, ‘how does what you’re looking at relate to what you feel?’” Isaacowitz says.
Results revealed that older and younger participants might regulate their emotions in vastly different ways. As Isaacowitz puts it, “One way of regulating emotion is to change your thinking about something, to see something upsetting and say ‘no’.” This seems to be the strategy of most younger test subjects.
On the other hand, older people tend to look at negative images less often, possibly indicating that they regulate emotion by distracting themselves from negative stimuli.
Isaacowitz says this makes sense, since the elderly tend to have fewer resources than the young: “If I made you really tired or gave you something else to do, it would be easier to distract instead of reappraise.”
While Isaacowitz’ research has already confirmed a cognitive difference between older and younger people, many questions remain about how this difference may relate to the role of age in regulating day-to-day emotion.
Isaacowitz was eager to join the Affective Science Institute at Northeastern and help advance the university’s strength in aging research. He says his lab on campus will conduct a number of new studies, including an analysis of subjects in a more natural environment. “We’ll be nicely set up to do that in the lab here,” he says.
Provided by Northeastern University
"Aging studies suggest older people are happier." February 16th, 2012. http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-02-aging-older-people-happier.html
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek