Search This Blog

Monday, August 1, 2011

நகைச்சுவை : சில Lovely Tamil Jokes


துப்பறியும் நிபுணர் வேலைக்கான இன்டர்வியூ அது. வந்திருந்த மூன்று பேருமே சர்தார்ஜிகள்தான். முதல் சர்தார்ஜி உள்ளே அழைக்கப்பட்டார்.

அவரிடம் ஒரு புகைப்படம் காட்டப்பட்டது. ஒரு நபரின் பக்கவாட்டில் இருந்து எடுத்த படம் அது. ''இவன் ஒரு கிரிமினல். இவனை கரெக்டா ஞாபகம் வெச்சுக்க எதை அடையாளமா எடுத்துக்குவீங்க?'' என்று கேட்டார் இன்டர்வியூ செய்த அதிகாரி.

சர்தார்ஜி சற்றும் தாமதிக்காமல் சொன்னார் - ''அவனுக்கு ஒரு கண்ணுதான் இருக்கு. ஈஸியா பிடிச்சுடலாம் சார்...''

அதிகாரிக்குக் கோபம் வந்துவிட்டது. ''இது என்ன முட்டாள்தனம்? பக்கவாட்டில் எடுக்கப்பட்ட படத்தில் ஒரு கண்தானே தெரியும்? அவனுக்கு இன்னொரு கண் இருக்காதுன்னு எப்படி முடிவுபண்ணலாம்?'' என்று எகிறிவிட்டு, அடுத்த சர்தார்ஜியை அழைத்தார்.

அவரிடமும் அதே புகைப்படம்... அதே கேள்வி!

''ஹா... இவனுக்கு ஒரு காதுதானே இருக்கு. இந்த அடையாளம் போதுமே!'' என்றார் அந்த சர்தார்ஜி. அதிகாரி தன் தலையில் தானே குட்டிக்கொண்டு அவரைத் துரத்திவிட்டார்.

மூன்றாவது சர்தார்ஜி வந்தார். கேள்வியையும் புகைப்படத்தையும் சில விநாடிகள் மனதில் ஓடவிட்டவர், ''அவன் கான்டாக்ட் லென்ஸ் போட்டிருக்கான் சார்!'' என்றார்.

அதிகாரிக்கு அது புதிராக இருந்தது. இது உண்மையாக இருக்குமோ என்று அந்த கிரிமினலின் பழைய ரெக்கார்டுகளைப் புரட்டினார். என்ன ஆச்சரியம்! அவன் கான்டாக்ட் லென்ஸ் அணியும் பழக்கம் உள்ளவன்தான்!

''என்னால நம்பவே முடியலை.. அற்புதம். அது எப்படி அவ்வளவு கரெக்டா அவன் கான்டாக்ட் லென்ஸ் தான் போட்டிருக்கான்னு சொன்னீங்க?'' என்று கேட்டார் அதிகாரி.

சர்தார்ஜி சொன்னார் - ''இதில் என்ன இருக்கு? அவனால சாதாரண கண்ணாடி அணிய முடியாது. அவனுக்கு ஒரு காது... ஒரு கண்ணுதானே இருக்கு!
=====================================================
சர்தார் 1 : என்ன மச்சான், நல்லா இருக்கியா ரொம்ப நாளா போனையே காணோம்

சர்தார் 2 : மாப்ள சத்தியமா நான் எடுக்கலடா நல்லா தேடிப் பாருடா............  

=========================================================
உங்க மாமா டெல்லிக்குப் போனாரே...
அங்க என்னவா இருக்கார்?

அங்கேயும் எங்க மாமாவாத்தான் இருக்கார்.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



உங்கள் ஊரில் பெரிய மனிதர்கள் யாராவது
பிறந்திருக்கிறார்களா?

இல்லை, குழைந்தைகள்தான் பிறந்திருக்கின்றன.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




====================================================================
ஒரு சிறப்புக் கேள்வி. ஐ.ஏ.எஸ் வினாத்தாளில் உள்ள கேள்வி. முடிந்தால் நீங்கள் பதில் கூறலாம்.

ரோட்டில் ஒரு பையனும் பொன்னும் நடந்து போறாங்க. பையனோட மாமியார் பொண்ணோட  மாமியாருக்கு அம்மா. அப்படின்னா ரெண்டு பேருக்கும் என்ன உறவு?


Read more: http://www.livingextra.com/2011/08/lovely-tamil-jokes.html#ixzz1TkyJQPxA

SEATING ARRANGEMENT OF STADIUMI















'Brain Cap' Technology Turns Thought Into Motion; Mind-Machine Interface Could Lead to New Life-Changing Technologies for Millions of People



University of Maryland associate professor of kinesiology Jose "Pepe" Contreras-Vidal wears his Brain Cap, a noninvasive, sensor-lined cap with neural interface software that soon could be used to control computers, robotic prosthetic limbs, motorized wheelchairs and even digital avatars. (Credit: John Consoli, University of Maryland)

Science Daily  — "Brain cap" technology being developed at the University of Maryland allows users to turn their thoughts into motion. Associate Professor of Kinesiology José 'Pepe' L. Contreras-Vidal and his team have created a non-invasive, sensor-lined cap with neural interface software that soon could be used to control computers, robotic prosthetic limbs, motorized wheelchairs and even digital avatars.


The potential and rapid progression of the UMD brain cap technology can be seen in a host of recent developments, including a just published study in the Journal of Neurophysiology, new grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health, and a growing list of partners that includes the University of Maryland School of Medicine, the Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Rice University and Walter Reed Army Medical Center's Integrated Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation."We are on track to develop, test and make available to the public- within the next few years -- a safe, reliable, noninvasive brain computer interface that can bring life-changing technology to millions of people whose ability to move has been diminished due to paralysis, stroke or other injury or illness," said Contreras-Vidal of the university's School of Public Health.
"We are doing something that few previously thought was possible," said Contreras-Vidal, who is also an affiliate professor in Maryland's Fischell Department of Bioengineering and the university's Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program. "We use EEG [electroencephalography] to non-invasively read brain waves and translate them into movement commands for computers and other devices.
Peer Reviewed
Contreras-Vidal and his team have published three major papers on their technology over the past 18 months, the latest a just released study in the Journal of Neurophysiology in which they successfully used EEG brain signals to reconstruct the complex 3-D movements of the ankle, knee and hip joints during human treadmill walking. In two earlier studies they showed (1) similar results for 3-D hand movement and (2) that subjects wearing the brain cap could control a computer cursor with their thoughts.
Alessandro Presacco, a second-year doctoral student in Contreras-Vidal's Neural Engineering and Smart Prosthetics Lab, Contreras-Vidal and co-authors write that their Journal of Neurophysiology study indicated "that EEG signals can be used to study the cortical dynamics of walking and to develop brain-machine interfaces aimed at restoring human gait function."
There are other brain computer interface technologies under development, but Contreras-Vidal notes that these competing technologies are either very invasive, requiring electrodes to be implanted directly in the brain, or, if noninvasive, require much more training to use than does UMD's EEG-based, brain cap technology.
Partnering to Help Sufferers of Injury and Stroke
Contreras-Vidal and his team are collaborating on a rapidly growing cadre projects with researchers at other institutions to develop thought-controlled robotic prosthetics that can assist victims of injury and stroke. Their latest partnership is supported by a new $1.2 million NSF grant. Under this grant, Contreras-Vidal's Maryland team is embarking on a four-year project with researchers at Rice University, the University of Michigan and Drexel University to design a prosthetic arm that amputees can control directly with their brains, and which will allow users to feel what their robotic arm touches.
"There's nothing fictional about this," said Rice University co-principal investigator Marcia O'Malley, an associate professor of mechanical engineering. "The investigators on this grant have already demonstrated that much of this is possible. What remains is to bring all of it -- non-invasive neural decoding, direct brain control and [touch] sensory feedback -- together into one device."
In a NIH-supported project underway, Contreras-Vidal and his colleagues are pairing their brain cap's EEG-based technology with a DARPA-funded next-generation robotic arm designed by researchers at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory to function like a normal limb. And the UMD team is developing a new collaboration with the New Zealand's start-up Rexbionics, the developer of a powered lower-limb exoskeleton called Rex that could be used to restore gait after spinal cord injury.
Two of the earliest partnerships formed by Contreras-Vidal and his team are with the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore and the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Baltimore. A particular focus of this research is the use of the brain cap technology to help stroke victims whose brain injuries affect their motor-sensory control. Originally funded by a seed grant from the University of Maryland, College Park and the University of Maryland, Baltimore, the work now also is supported by a VA merit grant (anklebot BMI) and an NIH grant (Stroke).
"There is a big push in brain science to understand what exercise does in terms of motor learning or motor retraining of the human brain," says Larry Forrester, an associate professor of physical therapy and rehabilitation science at the University of Maryland School of Medicine.
For the more than a year, Forrester and the UMD team have tracked the neural activity of people on a treadmill doing precise tasks like stepping over dotted lines. The researchers are matching specific brain activity recorded in real time with exact lower-limb movements.
This data could help stroke victims in several ways, Forrester says. One is a prosthetic device, called an "anklebot," or ankle robot, that stores data from a normal human gait and assists partially paralyzed people. People who are less mobile commonly suffer from other health issues such as obesity, diabetes or cardiovascular problems, Forrester says, "so we want to get [stroke survivors] up and moving by whatever means possible."
The second use of the EEG data in stroke victims is more complex, yet offers exciting possibilities. "By decoding the motion of a normal gait," Contreras-Vidal says, "we can then try and teach stroke victims to think in certain ways and match their own EEG signals with the normal signals." This could "retrain" healthy areas of the brain in what is known as neuroplasticity.
One potential method for retraining comes from one of the Maryland research team's newest members, Steve Graff, a first-year bioengineering doctoral student. He envisions a virtual reality game that matches real EEG data with on-screen characters. "It gives us a way to train someone to think the right thoughts to generate movement from digital avatars. If they can do that, then they can generate thoughts to move a device," says Graff, who brings a unique personal perspective to the work. He has congenital muscular dystrophy and uses a motorized wheelchair. The advances he's working on could allow him to use both hands -- to put on a jacket, dial his cell phone or throw a football while operating his chair with his mind.
No Surgery Required
During the past two decades a great deal of progress has been made in the study of direct brain to computer interfaces, most of it through studies using monkeys with electrodes implanted in their brains. However, for use in humans such an invasive approach poses many problems, not the least of which is that most people don't' want holes in their heads and wires attached to their brains. "EEG monitoring of the brain, which has a long, safe history for other applications, has been largely ignored by those working on brain-machine interfaces, because it was thought that the human skull blocked too much of the detailed information on brain activity needed to read thoughts about movement and turn those readings into movement commands for multi-functional high-degree of freedom prosthetics," said Contreras-Vidal. He is among the few who have used EEG, MEG or other sensing technologies to develop non-invasive neural interfaces, and the only one to have demonstrated decoding results comparable to those achieved by researchers using implanted electrodes.
A paper Contreras-Vidal and colleagues published in theJournal of Neuroscience in March 2010 showed the feasibility of Maryland's EEG-based technology to infer multidimensional natural movement from noninvasive measurements of brain activity. In their two latest studies, Contreras-Vidal and his team have further advanced the development of their EEG brain interface technology, and provided powerful new evidence that it can yield brain computer interface results as good as or better than those from invasive studies, while also requiring minimal training to use.
In a paper published in April in the Journal of Neural Engineering, the Maryland team demonstrated that people wearing the EEG brain cap, could after minimal training control a computer cursor with their thoughts and achieve performance levels comparable to those by subjects using invasive implanted electrode brain computer interface systems. Contreras-Vidal and his co-authors write that this study also shows that compared to studies of other noninvasive brain control interface systems, training time with their system was substantially shorter, requiring only a single 40-minute session.

Fall of the Neanderthals: Volume of Modern Humans Infiltrating Europe Cited as Critical Factor




Science Daily  — New research sheds light on why, after 300,000 years of domination, European Neanderthals abruptly disappeared. Researchers from the University of Cambridge have discovered that modern humans coming from Africa swarmed the region, arriving with over ten times the population as the Neanderthal inhabitants.

The most plausible answer to this long-debated question has now been published in the journal Science by two researchers from the Department of Archaeology at Cambridge -- Professor Sir Paul Mellars, Professor Emeritus of Prehistory and Human Evolution, and Jennifer French, a second-year PhD student.The reasons for the relatively sudden disappearance of the European Neanderthal populations across the continent around 40,000 years ago has for long remained one of the great mysteries of human evolution. After 300 millennia of living, and evidently flourishing, in the cold, sub-glacial environments of central and western Europe, they were rapidly replaced over all areas of the continent by new, anatomically and genetically 'modern' (i.e. Homo sapiens) populations who had originated and evolved in the vastly different tropical environments of Africa.
By conducting a detailed statistical analysis of the archaeological evidence from the classic 'Perigord' region of southwestern France, which contains the largest concentration of Neanderthal and early modern human sites in Europe, they have found clear evidence that the earliest modern human populations penetrated the region in at least ten times larger numbers than those of the local Neanderthal populations already established in the same regions. This is reflected in a sharp increase in the total number of occupied sites, much higher densities of occupation residues (i.e. stone tools and animal food remains) in the sites, and bigger areas of occupation in the sites, revealing the formation of much larger and apparently more socially integrated social groupings.
Faced with this dramatic increase in the incoming modern human population, the capacity of the local Neanderthal groups to compete for the same range of living sites, the same range of animal food supplies (principally reindeer, horse, bison and red deer), and the same scarce fuel supplies to tide the groups over the extremely harsh glacial winters, would have been massively undermined. Additionally, almost inevitably, repeated conflicts or confrontations between the two populations would arise for occupation of the most attractive locations and richest food supplies, in which the increased numbers and more highly coordinated activities of the modern human groups would ensure their success over the Neanderthal groups.
The archaeological evidence also strongly suggests that the incoming modern groups possessed superior hunting technologies and equipment (e.g. more effective and long-range hunting spears), and probably more efficient procedures for processing and storing food supplies over the prolonged and exceptionally cold glacial winters. They also appear to have had more wide-ranging social contacts with adjacent human groups to allow for trade and exchange of essential food supplies in times of food scarcity.
Whether the incoming modern human groups also possessed more highly developed brains and associated mental capacities than the Neanderthals remains at present a matter of intense debate. But the sudden appearance of a wide range of complex and sophisticated art forms (including cave paintings), the large-scale production of elaborate decorative items (such as perforated stone and ivory beads, and imported sea shells), and clearly 'symbolic' systems of markings on bone and ivory tools -- all entirely lacking among the preceding Neanderthals -- strongly point to more elaborate systems of social communications among the modern groups, probably accompanied by more advanced and complex forms of language.
All of these new and more complex behavioural patterns can be shown to have developed first among the ancestral AfricanHomo sapiens populations, at least 20,0000 to 30,000 years before their dispersal from Africa, and progressive colonisation (and replacement of earlier populations) across all regions of Europe and Asia from around 60,000 years onwards.
If, as the latest genetic evidence strongly suggests, the AfricanHomo sapiens and European Neanderthal populations had been evolving separately for at least half a million years, then the emergence of some significant contrasts in the mental capacities of the two lineages would not be a particularly surprising development, in evolutionary terms.
Professor Sir Paul Mellars, Professor Emeritus of Prehistory and Human Evolution at the Department of Archaeology, said: "In any event, it was clearly this range of new technological and behavioural innovations which allowed the modern human populations to invade and survive in much larger population numbers than those of the preceding Neanderthals across the whole of the European continent. Faced with this kind of competition, the Neanderthals seem to have retreated initially into more marginal and less attractive regions of the continent and eventually -- within a space of at most a few thousand years -- for their populations to have declined to extinction -- perhaps accelerated further by sudden climatic deterioration across the continent around 40,000 years ago."
Whatever the precise cultural, behavioural and intellectual contrasts between the Neanderthals and intrusive modern human populations, this new study published in Sciencedemonstrates for the first time the massive numerical supremacy of the earliest modern human populations in western Europe, compared with those of the preceding Neanderthals, and thereby largely resolves one of the most controversial and long-running debates over the rapid decline and extinction of the enigmatic Neanderthal populations.

Largest-Ever Map of Plant Protein Interactions


The image shows an Arabidopsis plant overlaid on a network map of protein-protein interactions. The clusters of colors represent "communities" of interacting proteins that are enriched in specific plant processes. (Credit: Image courtesy of Joseph R. Ecker, Salk Institute for Biological Studies / Plant Photo: Joe Belcovson, Salk Institute for Biological Studies / Network map: Mary Galli, Salk Institute for Biological Studies and Matija Dreze, Center for Cancer Systems Biology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)
Science Daily — An international team of scientists has described their mapping and early analyses of thousands of protein-to-protein interactions within the cells of Arabidopsis thaliana -- a variety of mustard plant that is to plant biology what the lab mouse is to human biology.

The four-year project was funded by an $8 million National Science Foundation grant, and was headed by Marc Vidal, Pascal Braun, David Hill and colleagues at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston; and Ecker at the Salk Institute. "It was a natural collaboration," says Vidal, "because Joe and his colleagues at the Salk Institute had already sequenced the Arabidopsis genome and had cloned many of the protein-coding genes, whereas on our side at the Dana Farber Institute we had experience in making these protein interaction maps for other organisms such as yeast.""With this one study we managed to double the plant protein-interaction data that are available to scientists," says Salk Institute plant biologist Joseph Ecker, a professor in the Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Laboratory. "These data along with data from future 'interactome' mapping studies like this one should enable biologists to make agricultural plants more resistant to drought and diseases, more nutritious, and generally more useful to mankind."
In the initial stages of the project, members of Ecker's lab led by research technician Mary Galli converted most of their accumulated library of Arabidopsis protein-coding gene clones into a form useful for protein-interaction tests. "For this project, over 10,000 'open reading frame' clones were converted and sequence verified in preparation for protein-interaction screening," says Galli.
Vidal, Braun, Hill and their colleagues systematically ran these open reading frames through a high quality protein-interaction screening process, based on a test known as the yeast two-hybrid screen. Out of more than forty million possible pair combinations, they found a total of 6,205 Arabidopsis protein- protein interactions, involving 2,774 individual proteins. The researchers confirmed the high quality of these data, for example by showing their overlap with protein interaction datafrom past studies.
The new map of 6,205 protein partnerings represents only about two percent of the full protein- protein "interactome" forArabidopsis, since the screening test covered only a third of allArabidopsis proteins, and wasn't sensitive enough to detect many weaker protein interactions. "There will be larger maps after this one," says Ecker.
Even as a preliminary step, though, the new map is clearly useful. The researchers were able to sort the protein interaction pairs they found into functional groups, revealing networks and "communities" of proteins that work together. "There had been very little information, for example, on how plant hormone signaling pathways communicate with one another," says Ecker. "But in this study we were able to find a number of intriguing links between these pathways."
A further analysis of their map provided new insight into plant evolution. Ecker and colleagues Arabidopsis genome data, reported a decade ago, had revealed that plants randomly duplicate their genes to a much greater extent than animals do. These gene duplication events apparently give plants some of the genetic versatility they need to stay adapted to shifting environments. In this study, the researchers found 1900 pairs of their mapped proteins that appeared to be the products of ancient gene-duplication events.
Using advanced genomic dating techniques, the researchers were able to gauge the span of time since each of these gene-duplication events -- the longest span being 700 million years -- and compare it with the changes in the two proteins' interaction partners. "This provides a measure of how evolution has rewired the functions of these proteins," says Vidal. "Our large, high-quality dataset and the naturally high frequency of these gene duplications in Arabidopsis allowed us to make such an analysis for the first time."
The researchers found evidence that the Arabidopsis protein partnerships tend to change quickly after the duplication event, then more slowly as the duplicated gene settles into its new function and is held there by evolutionary pressure. "Even though the divergence of these proteins' amino-acid sequences may continue, the divergence in terms of their respective partners slows drastically after a rapid initial change, which we hadn't expected to see," Vidal says.
In the July 29 issue of Science researchers from theArabidopsis interactome mapping study reported yet another demonstration of the usefulness of their approach. Led by Jeffery L. Dangl of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, they examined Arabidopsis protein interactions with the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae (Psy) and a fungus-like microbe called Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (Hpa). "Even though these two pathogens are separated by about a billion years of evolution, it turns out that the 'effector' proteins they use to subvert Arabidopsis cells during infection are both targeted against the same set of highly connected Arabidopsisproteins," says Ecker. "We looked at some of these targetedArabidopsis proteins and found evidence that they serve as 'hubs' or control points for the plant immune system and related systems."
Ecker and his colleagues hope that these studies mark the start of a period of rapid advancement in understanding plant biology, and in putting that knowledge to use for human benefit. "This starts to give us a big, systems-level picture of howArabidopsis works, and much of that systems-level picture is going to be relevant to -- and guide further research on -- other plant species, including those used in human agriculture and even pharmaceuticals,"Ecker says.
The "Arabidopsis Interactome Mapping Consortium" consists of over 20 national and international laboratories that contribute to this study with support from a number of funding agencies including the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.

Bike lovers Air-conditioned Bike


  mail from SHIVA
 
 
 mail from SHIVA
 mail from SHIVA
 
 
 
 mail from SHIVA
 
 mail from SHIVA
 
 
 
 
 mail from SHIVA
 
 
 
 mail from SHIVA
 
 mail
 from SHIVA
 
 mail from SHIVA
 
 
 
 mail from SHIVA
 
 
 
 
 mail from SHIVA
 
 mail from SHIVA
 
 
 
 
 
 mail from SHIVA   

மிகப்பெரிய விண்வெளி கல் சீனாவில் கண்டுபிடிப்பு



பூமியில் சில தருணங்களில் விண்வெளி கற்கள் விழுவது உண்டு. அவ்வாறு விழுந்த அதிசய விண்வெளி கல் ஒன்றை சீன நிபுணர்கள் தற்போது கண்டுபிடித்து உள்ளனர்.
சீனா மற்றும மங்கோலியாவை பிரிக்கும் அல்டாய் மலைப்பகுதியில் இந்த விண்வெளிக் கல் கண்டுபிடிக்கப்பட்டு உள்ளது. இந்த புதிய விண்வெளி கல் 2.2 மீற்றர் நீளமும், 1.25 மீற்றர் உயரமும் கொண்டதாக உள்ளது.
உலகிலேயே மிகப் பெரிய 3வது விண்கல்லாக இந்த கல் உள்ளது. இந்த விண்வெளி கல் நமது பூமியில் உள்ள கல்லை விட கடினமாக இருந்தது. அட்லாய் மலைப்பிராந்தியத்தின் 10 ஆயிரம் அடி உயரத்தில் விண்வெளிக் கல் இருந்தது. இந்த விண்வெளிக் கல் மேற்பரப்பு, கறுப்பு, சிவப்பு என பல வண்ணங்களை பிரதிபலித்தது.
இந்த விண்வெளிக் கல்லை எதிர்பாராத விதமாக தான் கண்டுபிடித்தோம் என ஷாங்போலின் தெரிவித்தார். இவர் பெய்ஜிங் கண்காணிப்பக விண்வெளி கல் ஆய்வு நிபுணர் ஆவார்.
விண்வெளிக் கல் இரும்பு சார்ந்ததாக இருக்கும் என ஷாங்போலின் தெரிவித்தார். சூரியக் குடும்பம் உருவாகும் தருணத்தில் 450 கோடி ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன்னர் விண்வெளி கிரகங்கள் சேதம் அடைந்து இந்த கற்கள் உருவாகி இருக்கலாம் என நிபுணர்கள் கூறுகிறார்கள்.
1808 ஆம் ஆண்டு அவுஸ்திரேலியாவிலும், 1923 ஆம் ஆண்டு நமீபியாவிலும் மிகப் பெரிய விண்வெளிக் கல் கண்டுபிடிக்கப்பட்டது குறிப்பிடத்தக்கது.

இஞ்சி, பூண்டின் மருத்துவ குணங்கள்



இஞ்சிக்கு ஏராளமான மருத்துவ குணங்கள் உண்டு. நம் உண்ணும் உணவில் இஞ்சி கலந்து சாப்பிடுவதால் உணவு எளிதில் ஜீரணமாகிறது.
இஞ்சிக்கு ஞாபக சக்தியை அதிகரிக்கும் குணம் அதிகமுண்டு. மேலும் குடலில் சேரும் கிருமிகளை அழித்துவிடும். கல்லீரலை சுத்தப்படுத்துகிறது.
மலச்சிக்கல், வயிற்றுவலி ஏற்பட்டால் இஞ்சிச்சாறில் சிறிது உப்பு கலந்து பருக வேண்டும். பசி எடுக்காதவர்கள் இஞ்சியுடன் கொத்தமல்லி துவையல் அறைத்து சாப்பிட்டால் நன்கு பசி எடுக்கும்.
ஜலதோஷம் பிடித்தால் இஞ்சி கஷாயம் போட்டு குடித்தால் குணமாகும். தொண்டை வலி, ஆஸ்துமா போன்ற நோய்களுக்கு அருமருந்தாகும். பித்தம் அதிகமாகி தலைசுற்றல், விரக்தி ஏற்படுவதுண்டு. சுக்குத் தூளை தேனில் கலந்து சாப்பிட்டால் குணமாகும்.
இவ்வாறு மருத்துவ மகத்துவம் கொண்ட இஞ்சியை தினமும் உணவில் சட்னி, பொங்கல், பொரியலில் சேர்த்து பயன் பெறலாம். அப்படி செய்வதன் மூலம் உணவே மருந்தாகிவிடும்.
வெள்ளைப்பூண்டின் மருத்துவ பயன்கள்:
உடல் பருமனையும், ரத்தத்தில் உள்ள கொழுப்பையும் குறைக்கும். இதய அடைப்பை நீக்கும். இரத்த அழுத்தம் வராமல் காக்கும்.
இரத்த அழுத்தம் வந்த பின் கட்டுப்படுத்தும் மருந்தாகவும் பூண்டு விளங்குகிறது. நாள்பட்ட சளித்தொல்லையை நீக்கும். தொண்டை சதையை நீக்கும். மலேரியா, யானைக்கால், காசநோய்க் கிருமிகளுக்கு எதிராக செயல்படும்.
வெள்ளைப் பூண்டை பாலில் வேகவைத்து மஞ்சள் தூள் கலந்து சாப்பிட்டால் சளித் தொல்லைகள் நீங்கும். பூண்டு, சிறிது புளி, மிளகாய் வத்தல் ஆகியவற்றை எண்ணெயில் விட்டு வதக்கி துவையல் செய்து சாப்பிடலாம்.
மிளகாய் வத்தல் தேங்காய்த் துருவல் இரண்டையும் ஒரு நாள் முழுவதும் வெயிலில் காயவைத்த பின் அவற்றுடன் தோல் உரிக்காத பூண்டு, உப்பு சேர்த்து அரைத்து பொடி செய்து இட்லி தோசைக்குச் சாப்பிடலாம்.
நல்லெண்ணெயில் ஒரு துண்டு வெள்ளைப்பூண்டு போட்டுக் காய்ச்சி பொறுக்கக் கூடிய அளவு சூட்டில் இரண்டு சொட்டுக் காதில் விட்டால் காது வலி நீங்கும்
பூண்டு உடல் உஷ்ணத்தை அதிகப்படுத்தக் கூடியது. அதிகளவில் பயன்படுத்தினால் நீர்க்கடுப்பு, நீர் எரிச்சல் உண்டாகும். தினமும் இரண்டு பல் துண்டு பூண்டு சாப்பிட்டு வந்தால் நோய் எதிர்ப்பு சக்தி அதிகமாகும்.